Evidence mapPaperPMID 35814409Full record

ReviewFrontiers in oncology2022

Drug Repurposing by Tumor Tissue Editing.

Florian Lüke, Dennis Christoph Harrer, Pan Pantziarka, Tobias Pukrop, Lina Ghibelli, Christopher Gerner, Albrecht Reichle, Daniel Heudobler

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Florian LükeDepartment of Internal Medicine III, Hematology and Oncology, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Dennis Christoph HarrerDepartment of Internal Medicine III, Hematology and Oncology, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Pan PantziarkaThe George Pantziarka TP53 Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Tobias PukropDepartment of Internal Medicine III, Hematology and Oncology, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Lina GhibelliDepartment of Biology, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy.
Christopher GernerDepartment of Analytical Chemistry, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Albrecht ReichleDepartment of Internal Medicine III, Hematology and Oncology, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Daniel HeudoblerDepartment of Internal Medicine III, Hematology and Oncology, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
University Hospital Regensburg · DEGeorge Institute for Global Health · GBUniversity of Rome Tor Vergata · ITUniversity of Vienna · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The combinatory use of drugs for systemic cancer therapy commonly aims at the direct elimination of tumor cells through induction of apoptosis. An alternative approach becomes the focus of attention if biological changes in tumor tissues following combinatory administration of regulatorily active drugs are considered as a therapeutic aim, e.g., differentiation, transdifferentiation induction, reconstitution of immunosurveillance, the use of alternative cell death mechanisms. Editing of the tumor tissue establishes new biological 'hallmarks' as a 'pressure point' to attenuate tumor growth. This may be achieved with repurposed, regulatorily active drug combinations, often simultaneously targeting different cell compartments of the tumor tissue. Moreover, tissue editing is paralleled by decisive functional changes in tumor tissues providing novel patterns of target sites for approved drugs. Thus, agents with poor activity in non-edited tissue may reveal new clinically meaningful outcomes. For tissue editing and targeting edited tissue novel requirements concerning drug selection and administration can be summarized according to available clinical and pre-clinical data. Monoactivity is no pre-requisite, but combinatory bio-regulatory activity. The regulatorily active dose may be far below the maximum tolerable dose, and besides inhibitory active drugs stimulatory drug activities may be integrated. Metronomic scheduling often seems to be of advantage. Novel preclinical approaches like functional assays testing drug combinations in tumor tissue are needed to select potential drugs for repurposing. The two-step drug repurposing procedure, namely establishing novel functional systems states in tumor tissues and consecutively providing novel target sites for approved drugs, facilitates the systematic identification of drug activities outside the scope of any original clinical drug approvals.

Indexed as

anakoinosisbiomodulationmetronomic chemotherapymolecular diagnosticsmTORpioglitazonePPAR γumbrella trial

Identifiers

PMID35814409
PMCPMC9270020
OpenAlexW4283449234

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.