ArticleMedical physics2022
Intracranial vessel wall segmentation with deep learning using a novel tiered loss function incorporating class inclusion.
Article in Medical physics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinically oriented deep learning framework for automated vessel wall segmentation in black-blood MRI: a multi-center study.European radiology · 2026Article
- VWI-APP: Vessel wall imaging-dedicated automated processing pipeline for intracranial atherosclerotic plaque quantification.Medical physics · 2023Article
- Deep learning and high-resolution magnetic resonance vascular wall imaging: current challenges and future perspectives.Frontiers in neurologyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo develop an automated vessel wall segmentation method on T1-weighted intracranial vessel wall magnetic resonance images, with a focus on modeling the inclusion relation between the inner and outer boundaries of the vessel wall.
methodsWe propose a novel method that estimates the inner and outer vessel wall boundaries simultaneously, using a network with a single output channel resembling the level-set function height. The network is driven by a unique tiered loss that accounts for data fidelity of the lumen and vessel wall classes and a length regularization to encourage boundary smoothness.
resultsImplemented with a 2.5D UNet with a ResNet backbone, the proposed method achieved Dice similarity coefficients (DSC) in 2D of 0.925 ± 0.048, 0.786 ± 0.084, Hausdorff distance (HD) of 0.286 ± 0.436, 0.345 ± 0.419 mm, and mean surface distance (MSD) of 0.083 ± 0.037 and 0.103 ± 0.032 mm for the lumen and vessel wall, respectively, on a test set; compared favorably to a baseline UNet model that achieved DSC 0.924 ± 0.047, 0.794 ± 0.082, HD 0.298 ± 0.477, 0.394 ± 0.431 mm, and MSD 0.087 ± 0.056, 0.119 ± 0.059 mm. Our vessel wall segmentation method achieved substantial improvement in morphological integrity and accuracy compared to benchmark methods.
conclusionsThe proposed method provides a systematic approach to model the inclusion morphology and incorporate it into an optimization infrastructure. It can be applied to any application where inclusion exists among a (sub)set of classes to be segmented. Improved feasibility in result morphology promises better support for clinical quantification and decision.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.