Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35817937›Full record

ArticleNature methods2022

Real age prediction from the transcriptome with RAPToR.

Romain Bulteau, Mirko Francesconi

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature methods, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Progeny effects of rotenone exposure depend on parental toxicity.Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology · 2026
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Axon termination of the SAB motor neurons inbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. The regulatory architecture of gene expression variation inbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Romain BulteauLaboratoire de Biologie et Modelisation de la Cellule, Ecole normale superieure de Lyon, CNRS, UMR 5239, Inserm, U1293, Universite Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Lyon, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9128-8809
Mirko FrancesconiLaboratoire de Biologie et Modelisation de la Cellule, Ecole normale superieure de Lyon, CNRS, UMR 5239, Inserm, U1293, Universite Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Lyon, France. mirko.francesconi@ens-lyon.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8702-0877

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Transcriptomic data is often affected by uncontrolled variation among samples that can obscure and confound the effects of interest. This variation is frequently due to unintended differences in developmental stages between samples. The transcriptome itself can be used to estimate developmental progression, but existing methods require many samples and do not estimate a specimen's real age. Here we present real-age prediction from transcriptome staging on reference (RAPToR), a computational method that precisely estimates the real age of a sample from its transcriptome, exploiting existing time-series data as reference. RAPToR works with whole animal, dissected tissue and single-cell data for the most common animal models, humans and even for non-model organisms lacking reference data. We show that RAPToR can be used to remove age as a confounding factor and allow recovery of a signal of interest in differential expression analysis. RAPToR will be especially useful in large-scale single-organism profiling because it eliminates the need for accurate staging or synchronisation before profiling.

Indexed as

RaptorsTranscriptomeAnimalsGene Expression ProfilingHumans

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.