Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35818040›Full record

ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2022

Understanding perinatal patient's health preferences and patient-provider relationships to prevent congenital syphilis in California and Louisiana.

Jennifer A Wagman, Eunhee Park, Gloria P Giarratano, Pierre M Buekens, Emily W Harville

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. State-of-the-Art Review: Congenital Syphilis in the Modern Era: Current Strategies and Future Directions.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jennifer A WagmanFielding School of Public Health, Department of Community Health Sciences, University of California, 650 Charles E Young Dr S, Los Angeles, CA, 90095, USA. jennwagman@ucla.edu.
Eunhee ParkFielding School of Public Health, Department of Community Health Sciences, University of California, 650 Charles E Young Dr S, Los Angeles, CA, 90095, USA.
Gloria P GiarratanoLouisiana State University Health Sciences Center, School of Nursing, 1900 Gravier St, New Orleans, LA, 70112, USA.
Pierre M BuekensSchool of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, Department of Epidemiology, Tulane University, 1440 Canal Street, Suite 2000, New Orleans, LA, 70112, USA.
Emily W HarvilleSchool of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, Department of Epidemiology, Tulane University, 1440 Canal Street, Suite 2000, New Orleans, LA, 70112, USA.
Tulane University · USLouisiana State University Health Sciences Center New Orleans · US

Funding

CDC HHS U380T000199-05-00
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCongenital syphilis (CS) has reemerged as a global maternal and child health crisis. Kern County, California and East Baton Rouge Parish, Louisiana are among the highest CS morbidity regions in the United States. We previously reported on social-ecological and structural barriers to prenatal care and maternal syphilis testing and treatment in these two regions. The aim of this study was to examine perinatal patient's health preferences and perceptions of patient-provider relationships in the prenatal care clinic setting.

methodsBetween May 2018 and January 2019 we conducted 20 in-depth qualitative interviews with prenatal providers and 8 focus group discussions with pregnant and postpartum individuals in Kern County and East Baton Rouge Parish. We applied an adapted health services framework to analyze participants' understanding of health disparities and vulnerable populations; perinatal patient's health and prenatal care preferences; and participants' perspectives of clinical encounters in the context of prenatal care and maternal syphilis testing and treatment.

resultsSite-specific determinants of syphilis infection emerged but participants from both locations felt CS prevention efforts should be prioritized among youth, racial/ethnic minority populations, people experiencing socioeconomic limitations and people with other commonly occurring health conditions. Although perinatal patients expressed clear health preferences, they reported inconsistent receipt of respectful, patient-centered care. Inconsistencies were connected with limited ethnic and cultural competence among providers, and implicit, negative attitudes toward patients using substances, experiencing homelessness, or engaging in sex work. Providers clearly aimed to offer high quality prenatal care. However, some clinic and health systems level factors were thought to reduce positive and communicative patient-provider relationships, contributing to gaps in use of prenatal care and syphilis testing and treatment.

conclusionsOur findings suggest that interventions tailored to address setting-specific determinants (including clinic and health system factors) of disparities in CS risk could improve pregnant people's access to prenatal care and ensure they and their sex partners receive timely syphilis screening and treatment. We recommend all prenatal care providers receive training on how to identify and mitigate implicit biases and provide competent and compassionate patient-centered care.

Indexed as

Pregnancy Complications, InfectiousSyphilisSyphilis, CongenitalAdolescentCaliforniaChildEthnicityFemaleHumansLouisianaMinority GroupsPregnancyPrenatal CareUnited StatesCongenitalHealth disparitiesHealth preferencesPregnancyPrenatal careQualitative researchSexually transmitted infectionSyphilis

Identifiers

PMID35818040
PMCPMC9275237
OpenAlexW4285014000

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.