Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35819537›Full record

ArticleJournal of digital imaging2022

Analyzing Transfer Learning of Vision Transformers for Interpreting Chest Radiography.

Mohammad Usman, Tehseen Zia, Ali Tariq

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of digital imaging, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Mohammad UsmanDepartment of Computer Science, COMSATS University Islamabad (CUI), Islamabad, Pakistan.
Tehseen ZiaDepartment of Computer Science, COMSATS University Islamabad (CUI), Islamabad, Pakistan.
Ali TariqDepartment of Computer Science, COMSATS University Islamabad (CUI), Islamabad, Pakistan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Limited availability of medical imaging datasets is a vital limitation when using "data hungry" deep learning to gain performance improvements. Dealing with the issue, transfer learning has become a de facto standard, where a pre-trained convolution neural network (CNN), typically on natural images (e.g., ImageNet), is finetuned on medical images. Meanwhile, pre-trained transformers, which are self-attention-based models, have become de facto standard in natural language processing (NLP) and state of the art in image classification due to their powerful transfer learning abilities. Inspired by the success of transformers in NLP and image classification, large-scale transformers (such as vision transformer) are trained on natural images. Based on these recent developments, this research aims to explore the efficacy of pre-trained natural image transformers for medical images. Specifically, we analyze pre-trained vision transformer on CheXpert and pediatric pneumonia dataset. We use CNN standard models including VGGNet and ResNet as baseline models. By examining the acquired representations and results, we discover that transfer learning from the pre-trained vision transformer shows improved results as compared to pre-trained CNN which demonstrates a greater transfer ability of the transformers in medical imaging.

Indexed as

Machine LearningNeural Networks, ComputerChildHumansRadiographyChest X-raysClassificationTransfer learningVision transformer

Identifiers

PMID35819537
PMCPMC9274969

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.