Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35829658›Full record

SynthesisDiseases of the esophagus : official journal of the International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus2022

Efficacy and safety of triamcinolone acetonide in the prevention of esophageal stricture after endoscopic submucosal dissection: a meta-analysis.

Yuting Jia, Bin Guo, Wenbin Zhang, Erfeng Li, Quanmao Zhang

Open access · hybridAbstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Diseases of the esophagus : official journal of the International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yuting JiaDepartment of Endoscopy Center, Shanxi Province Cancer Hospital, Taiyuan, China.
Bin GuoDepartment of Endoscopy Center, Shanxi Province Cancer Hospital, Taiyuan, China.
Wenbin ZhangDepartment of Endoscopy Center, Shanxi Province Cancer Hospital, Taiyuan, China.
Erfeng LiDepartment of Endoscopy Center, Shanxi Province Cancer Hospital, Taiyuan, China.
Quanmao ZhangDepartment of Endoscopy Center, Shanxi Province Cancer Hospital, Taiyuan, China.
Shanxi Provincial Cancer Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimThe role of triamcinolone acetonide (TA) in the prevention of esophageal stricture is not well established. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate its safety and efficacy for the prevention of esophageal stricture after endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD).

methodsA comprehensive search was performed in electronic databases including PubMed, the Cochrane Library, Embase for possible controlled studies. The primary outcomes were stenosis rate and endoscopic balloon dilatation (EBD) sessions required, and secondary outcome included complications. Random effects were used to calculate the pooled outcome. Sensitivity analysis and publication bias were conducted to verify the robustness and reliability of the results. Results: Ten studies containing 499 patients were obtained. In the pooled analysis, statistical significance was found in triamcinolone acetonide injection reduced the incidence of stenosis (OR = 0.29, 95% CI [0.11, 0.80], P < 0.05) and the number of endoscopic balloon dilation (MD = -3.33, 95% CI [-4.15, -2.50], P < 0.0001) compared with control. Triamcinolone acetonide injection therapy did not increase the risk of complications (OR = -0.77%, CI [-1.62, 0.09], P = 0.08). Subgroup analysis indicated that the single injection of triamcinolone acetonide after endoscopic submucosal dissection significantly reduced the incidence of stenosis compared with without any prophylaxis. Different concentrations and single session volume of triamcinolone acetonide reduced the incidence of stenosis. It also showed that the dose according to the size of the lesion was more effective than the fixed dose in preventing esophageal stricture. Conclusion: Triamcinolone acetonide injection can reduce the incidence of stricture formation as well as the need for EBD sessions without increasing complications.

Indexed as

Endoscopic Mucosal ResectionEsophageal StenosisTriamcinolone AcetonideHumansTreatment OutcomeTriamcinolone Acetonideendoscopic balloon dilatationendoscopic submucosal dissectionmeta-analysisstricturetriamcinolone acetonide

Identifiers

PMID35829658
PMCPMC9753049
OpenAlexW4285395970

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.