Trial reportEuropean journal of applied physiology2022
An equation to predict peak heart rate for prescribing exercise intensity in middle-aged to older patients requiring hemodialysis.
Trial report in European journal of applied physiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
- Predictive Equation for Peak Heart Rate and First Ventilatory Threshold Heart Rate in Patients With Coronary Heart Disease.Cardiology research and practice · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeExercise prescription based on a population-specific physiological response can help ensure safe and effective physical interventions. However, as a facile approach for exercise prescription in hemodialysis population that is based on their exercise capacity has not yet been established, the aim of our study was to develop a unique prediction formula for peak heart rate (HR) that can be used in this population.
methodsThis cross-sectional study measured physical function and HR at peak exercise and anaerobic threshold (AT) during cardiopulmonary exercise tests in 126 individuals. Participants were randomly assigned to the development group (n = 78), whose data were used to calculate the prediction equation, or the validation group (n = 48).
resultsThe HR reserve in this population was significantly lower (0.44 ± 0.20%) and there was a large discrepancy between conventional age-predicted maximal HR and measured peak-HR values (R = 0.36). The average of the ratio between HR at AT point and peak HR was 85% (95% CI, 83.5%-86.4%). The peak-HR prediction equation was based on resting HR, presence of diabetes, physical dysfunction (gait speed < 1.0 m/s), and hypoalbuminemia (< 3.5 g/dL). It showed high prediction accuracy (R
conclusionAerobic exercise based on estimated peak HR < 85% obtained from the equation in this study may enable safe and effective physical intervention in this population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.