Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35831759›Full record

Observational studyArchives of gynecology and obstetrics2023

Wearable technology for health monitoring during pregnancy: an observational cross-sectional survey study.

Colin Wakefield, Lena Yao, Steve Self, Martin G Frasch

Open access · bronzeAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Archives of gynecology and obstetrics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Colin WakefieldDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Center on Human Development and Disability (CHDD), University of Washington, 1959 NE Pacific St, Box 356460, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA.
Lena YaoFetal Precision, LLC, Seattle, WA, USA.
Steve SelfFetal Precision, LLC, Seattle, WA, USA.
Martin G FraschDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Center on Human Development and Disability (CHDD), University of Washington, 1959 NE Pacific St, Box 356460, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA. mfrasch@uw.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-3159-6321
Precision for Medicine (United States) · USUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo evaluate how women of child-bearing age perceive the use of remote fetal ECG monitoring technologies. Telemedicine has advanced to the forefront of healthcare delivery, including maternal-fetal medicine. Smart wearable electrocardiogram (ECG) devices can enable pregnant women to monitor their health and that of their fetuses. Such technology would be a logical extension of the telemedicine ecosystem.

methodsWe conducted an observational cross-sectional study via online surveying in the United States. Study participants were recruited using the SurveyMonkey Audience Polling system and responded virtually. In all, the sample consisted of 507 women, aged 18-45 from 45 states, who are expecting to become pregnant in the next five years. Women were asked to identify their willingness to use a wearable ECG device the size of a patch-sized large band-aid on their abdomen. Ten binary or multiple-choice questions were used to gauge population interest and related demographics toward the usage of a wearable ECG device.

resultsOf the 507 participants, 461 (91%) women expressed an acceptance of wearable ECG technology throughout the pregnancy as a mechanism for increased frequency of monitoring of maternal and fetal health outside the hospital. 395 (78%) women demonstrated a willingness to wear devices day and night or at least during sleep and 213 (42%) of the women would spend up to $200 on such a device.

conclusionEven though conducted prior to the COVID-19 pandemic, this study clearly indicates a high degree of readiness of prospective pregnant women for telemedicine with continuous health monitoring of the mother-fetus dyad.

Indexed as

COVID-19Wearable Electronic DevicesCross-Sectional StudiesEcosystemFemaleHumansMalePandemicsPregnancyProspective StudiesUnited StatesAntepartum monitoringFetal healthMaternal healthPregnancyTelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID35831759
PMCPMC9281287
OpenAlexW4285389065

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.