ArticleSAGE open medicine2022
Levels of leachable elements from long-term use of enFlow fluid warmer.
Article in SAGE open medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: In the delivery of intravenous fluids, in-line warming devices frequently transfer heat using a metal heating plate, which if uncoated can risk elution. This bench study examined extractable elements detected following long-term use of the parylene-coated enFlow Methods: We tested 16 clinically relevant challenge fluids typical of the surgical setting, including commercially available single donor blood and blood products as well as intravenous saline and electrolyte solutions. After 72 h of warming at 40°C (104°F) via the enFlow, analytical chemistry identified and quantified the most clinically significant extractable elements (arsenic, barium, cadmium, copper, and lead) to estimate chemical exposure. We also measured the extracted concentrations of these five elements following simulated use of the device with three solutions (Sterofundin ISO, Plasma-Lyte 148, and whole blood) that were pumped through the warmed device at two different flow rates (0.2 and 5.5 mL min Results: Across all scenarios of acute and long-term exposures for different populations, the enFlow demonstrated low toxicological risks as measured by the calculation of tolerable exposure for extracted arsenic, barium, cadmium, copper, and lead. Conclusion: The results suggest biological safety for the use of parylene-coated enFlow with a variety of intravenous solutions and in different therapeutic scenarios.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.