ReviewScanning2022
Observation on the Effect of Rehabilitative Physical Training on Sports Injuries under Ultrasound Image Examination.
Review in Scanning, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
- Retraction · 2023-07-12Concerns/Issues about Data · Concerns/Issues about Results and/or Conclusions · Concerns/Issues about Referencing/Attributions · Concerns/Issues about Peer Review · Informed/Patient Consent - None/Withdrawn · Investigation by Journal/Publisher · Investigation by Third Party · Lack of IRB/IACUC Approval and/or Compliance · Paper Mill · Computer-Aided Content or Computer-Generated Content · Unreliable Results and/or Conclusions · · See also: https://pubpeer.com/publications/60CE2A550F44705B4C1928AC9DE646
- Retracted
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In order to observe the effect of rehabilitative physical training on sports injuries under ultrasound examination, this study firstly carried out experiments, induction and analysis of ultrasound examination, and evaluation-related content, especially the diagnosis of ultrasound examination in muscle and tendon injuries caused by various reasons. And the clinical application of treatment (clinical research) is reviewed, in order to provide reference data for clinical stage summary. Then, by determining the fasciculation and location of the tendon rupture injury by ultrasound, the clinic can decide whether or not to proceed with surgery. Small Achilles tendon tears only require conservative treatment to avoid the development of complete Achilles tendon rupture. Finally, 26 patients and 10 healthy adults were examined by ultrasonography, and each subject was segmented to examine 11 muscles, including the tongue muscle. The bilateral trapezius, bilateral biceps brachii, bilateral abductor pollicis brevis, bilateral quadriceps femoris, and bilateral tibialis anterior muscles were evaluated by ultrasound and statistical methods. The experimental results show that if the fasciculation of the Achilles tendon injury does not reach more than 3/11, it indicates that no surgical treatment is required; for those with a complete tear of the Achilles tendon, the distance between the broken ends should be further measured in the toe flexion state to evaluate whether surgical treatment is required. It effectively solves the problem of visual diagnosis of sports injuries.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.