Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35832521›Full record

ReviewEvidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM2022

Investigating Polyphenol Nanoformulations for Therapeutic Targets against Diabetes Mellitus.

Fahadul Islam, Jannatul Fardous Khadija, Md Rezaul Islam, Sheikh Shohag, Saikat Mitra, Saad Alghamdi, Ahmad O Babalghith, Abdulrahman Theyab, Mohammad Tauhidur Rahman, Aklima Akter and 3 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 7 institutions in 3 countries.

Fahadul IslamDepartment of Pharmacy, Faculty of Allied Health Sciences, Daffodil International University, Dhaka 1207, Bangladesh.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8167-8264
Jannatul Fardous KhadijaDepartment of Pharmacy, Faculty of Allied Health Sciences, Daffodil International University, Dhaka 1207, Bangladesh.
Md Rezaul IslamDepartment of Pharmacy, Faculty of Allied Health Sciences, Daffodil International University, Dhaka 1207, Bangladesh.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6949-8837
Sheikh ShohagDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Faculty of Life Science, Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujibur Rahman Science and Technology University, Gopalganj 8100, Bangladesh.
Saikat MitraDepartment of Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Dhaka, Dhaka 1000, Bangladesh.
Saad AlghamdiLaboratory Medicine Department, Faculty of Applied Medical Sciences, Umm Al-Qura University, Makkah, Saudi Arabia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4532-9128
Ahmad O BabalghithMedical Genetics Department, College of Medicine, Umm Al-Qura University, Makkah, Saudi Arabia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6650-9158
Abdulrahman TheyabDeputy Manager of Laboratory & Blood Bank, Security Forces Hospital, Makkah, Saudi Arabia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6152-7709
Mohammad Tauhidur RahmanDepartment of Cardiology, Z. U Model Hospital, Feni 3900, Bangladesh.
Aklima AkterDepartment of Pharmacy, Faculty of Allied Health Sciences, Daffodil International University, Dhaka 1207, Bangladesh.
Abdullah Al MamunMolecular Pharmacology Research Center, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou 325035, Zhejiang, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9936-3925
Fahad A AlhumaydhiDepartment of Medical Laboratories, College of Applied Medical Sciences, Qassim University, Buraydah 52571, Saudi Arabia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0151-8309
Talha Bin EmranDepartment of Pharmacy, Faculty of Allied Health Sciences, Daffodil International University, Dhaka 1207, Bangladesh.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3188-2272
Daffodil International University · BDUmm al-Qura University · SAGopalganj Science and Technology University · BDQassim University · SASecurity Forces Hospital · SAUniversity of Dhaka · BDWenzhou Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Diabetes mellitus (DM) is a fatal metabolic disorder, and its prevalence has escalated in recent decades to a greater extent. Since the incidence and severity of the disease are constantly increasing, plenty of therapeutic approaches are being considered as a promising solution. Many dietary polyphenols have been reported to be effective against diabetes along with its accompanying vascular consequences by targeting multiple therapeutic targets. Additionally, the biocompatibility of these polyphenols raises questions about their use as pharmacological mediators. Nevertheless, the pharmacokinetic and biopharmaceutical properties of these polyphenols limit their clinical benefit as therapeutics. Pharmaceutical industries have attempted to improve compliance and therapeutic effects. However, nanotechnological approaches to overcome the pharmacokinetic and biopharmaceutical barriers associated with polyphenols as antidiabetic medications have been shown to be effective to improve clinical compliance and efficacy. Therefore, this review highlighted a comprehensive and up-to-date assessment of polyphenol nanoformulations in the treatment of diabetes and vascular consequences.

Identifiers

PMID35832521
PMCPMC9273389
OpenAlexW4283259508

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.