SynthesisJournal of human nutrition and dietetics : the official journal of the British Dietetic Association2023
Exploring stakeholder experiences of dietetic service and care delivery: A systematic qualitative review.
Synthesis in Journal of human nutrition and dietetics : the official journal of the British Dietetic Association, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Systematic Review of Patient Preferences and Experiences Regarding Dietetic Outpatient Care.Journal of human nutrition and dietetics : the official journal of the British Dietetic Association · 2025Pooled it
- Heat Stress Prevention and Management in the Construction Industry: A Gap Analysis.Annals of global health · 2025Pooled it
- Exploring stakeholder experiences of dietetic service and care delivery: A systematic qualitative review.Journal of human nutrition and dietetics : the official journal of the British Dietetic Association · 2023Pooled it
- Exploring the Acceptability of Integrating Dietitians Into Primary Care Dental Services for Children.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2026Article
- The business of dietetics: Results from the national Australian private practice dietetics dataset.Nutrition & dietetics : the journal of the Dietitians Association of Australia · 2026Article
- Telehealth during and beyond the COVID-19 Pandemic: Evidence from licensed dietitians in an emerging economy.PloS one · 2026Article
- Understanding Primary Care Dietitians' Experiences and Perspectives on Weight Management Practice Using the COM-B Model.Journal of human nutrition and dietetics : the official journal of the British Dietetic Association · 2025Article
- Evaluating clinicians' attitudes toward a web-based tool to support culturally and medically tailored nutrition services at the point of care.JAMIA open · 2025Article
- Navigating Person-Centred Nutrition and Mealtime Care in Rehabilitation: A Conceptual Model.Journal of human nutrition and dietetics : the official journal of the British Dietetic Association · 2025Article
- Enhancing Nutrition Care in Primary Healthcare: Exploring Practices, Barriers, and Multidisciplinary Solutions in Ireland.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025Article
- Exploring dietitians' experiences caring for patients living with obesity in acute care: a qualitative study.International journal of obesity (2005) · 2025Article
- Dietitians' endeavor to contribute to the nutritional health of children and youth with intellectual disability and autism.International journal of developmental disabilities · 2025Article
- Attitudes and knowledge of dietitian practice among a representative sample of Israeli adults.Preventive medicine reports · 2024Article
- Developing the EQUIPED approach to quality management using multi-grounded theory.Nutrition & dietetics : the journal of the Dietitians Association of Australia · 2023Article
- Exploring Overnutrition, Overweight, and Obesity in the Hospital Setting-A Point Prevalence Study.Nutrients · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThere is limited understanding of patients' and healthcare professionals' perceptions and experiences of receiving and delivering dietetic care, respectively. This systematic review of the literature used qualitative synthesis to explore the perceptions and experiences of multiple stakeholders involved in the delivery of nutrition care and dietetic service.
methodsMEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, Scopus, ISI Web of Science, PsycINFO and ProQuest were systematically searched. Study characteristics and perceptions of stakeholders regarding nutrition care services were extracted. Qualitative synthesis was employed and thematic analysis conducted.
resultsFive themes were identified from 44 studies related to stakeholders' perceptions of dietetic services. Studies included quantitative, qualitative and mixed methods involving patients, families, dietitians and other healthcare professionals. The themes were (1) patients desiring a personalised approach to nutrition care; (2) accessing dietetic service; (3) perceived impact of nutrition care on the patient; (4) relationships between stakeholders; and (5) beliefs about nutrition expertise. Two themes were specific to patients; these were the desire for individualised care and the impact of nutrition care. Within each theme perceptions varied with patients' views often contrasting with those of dietetic service providers.
conclusionsExperiences of dietetic service do not always meet stakeholder expectations which impacts on patient engagement. Seeking stakeholder input is imperative to design dietetic services that engage patients in positive and supportive clinical partnerships.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.