Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35833600›Full record

Trial reportJournal of human nutrition and dietetics : the official journal of the British Dietetic Association2023

Response to a novel, weight self-awareness plan used in a multi-component lifestyle intervention programme to reduce breast cancer risk factors in older women-Secondary analysis from the ActWELL trial.

Suzanne M M Zaremba, Martine Stead, Jennifer McKell, Ronan E O'Carroll, Nanette Mutrie, Shaun Treweek, Annie S Anderson, ActWELL team

Open access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of human nutrition and dietetics : the official journal of the British Dietetic Association, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Suzanne M M ZarembaDivision of Population Health & Genomics, Ninewells Hospital & Medical School, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1479-9653
Martine SteadFaculty of Health Sciences and Sport, Institute for Social Marketing and Health, University of Stirling, Stirling, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3066-4604
Jennifer McKellFaculty of Health Sciences and Sport, Institute for Social Marketing and Health, University of Stirling, Stirling, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2912-0837
Ronan E O'CarrollDivision of Psychology, School of Natural Sciences, University of Stirling, Stirling, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7090-3414
Nanette MutriePhysical Activity for Health Research Centre, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5018-6398
Shaun TreweekHealth Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7239-7241
Annie S AndersonDivision of Population Health & Genomics, Ninewells Hospital & Medical School, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0047-4500
ActWELL team
University of Stirling · GBUniversity of Dundee · GBUniversity of Aberdeen · GBUniversity of Edinburgh · GB

Funding

Chief Scientist Office HSRU1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe ActWELL randomised controlled trial assessed the effectiveness of a weight management programme delivered by volunteer lifestyle coaches (LCs) in women attending breast clinics. The intervention focused on caloric intake and physical activity, utilising behavioural change techniques including a weight awareness plan (WAP). The current work is a secondary analysis of the ActWELL data and aims to examine the response to the weight self-awareness plan (used as part of the intervention programme).

methodsThe LCs invited participants (n = 279) to undertake an implementation intention discussion to formulate a self-weighing (SW) plan. Bodyweight scales were offered, and recording books provided. The physical activity component of the intervention focused on a walking plan assessed by accelerometers. The LCs contacted participants by telephone monthly and provided personalised feedback. Mann-Whitney tests and chi-squared analysis were used to examine the effect of SW on weight change. A qualitative evaluation utilising semi-structured interviews was also undertaken.

resultsMost participants (96.4%) agreed to set a weekly SW goal and 76 (27%) requested scales. At 12 months, 226 (81%) returned for follow up. The median (interquartile range) weight change for those who self- reported at least one weight (n = 211) was -2.3 kg (-5.0 to 0.0) compared to -1.2 kg (-5.0 to 0.03) in those who did not (n = 14). Participants who reported weights on more than eight occasions (39%) were significantly more likely (p = 0.012) to achieve 5% weight loss compared to those who weighed less often. Low numbers of accelerometers were returned that did not allow for significance testing. Qualitative data (n = 24) indicated that many participants found the WAP helpful and motivating.

conclusionsGreater adherence to the WAP initiated by volunteer coaches is associated with achieving 5% weight loss.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsAgedExerciseFemaleHumansLife StyleRisk FactorsWeight Lossbreast-cancerself-monitoringweight

Identifiers

PMID35833600
PMCPMC10087426
OpenAlexW4285388828

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.