Evidence mapPaperPMID 35834196Full record

Trial reportJournal of consulting and clinical psychology2022

Results from "Developing Real Incentives and Volition for Exercise" (DRIVE): A pilot randomized controlled trial for promoting physical activity in African American women.

Allison M Sweeney, Dawn K Wilson, M Lee Van Horn, Nicole Zarrett, Kenneth Resnicow, Asia Brown, Mary Quattlebaum, Barney Gadson

Open access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of consulting and clinical psychology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Allison M SweeneyCollege of Nursing, University of South Carolina.ORCID 0000-0001-6398-8042
Dawn K WilsonDepartment of Psychology, University of South Carolina.
M Lee Van HornDepartment of Education Psychology, University of New Mexico.
Nicole ZarrettDepartment of Psychology, University of South Carolina.ORCID 0000-0001-9035-132X
Kenneth ResnicowDepartment of Health Behavior and Health Education, School of Public Health, University of Michigan.ORCID 0000-0003-1416-9627
Asia BrownDepartment of Psychology, University of South Carolina.ORCID 0000-0002-9829-0274
Mary QuattlebaumDepartment of Psychology, University of South Carolina.
Barney GadsonM. H. Newton Family Life Center.
University of South Carolina · USMichigan Department of Health and Human Services · USThe Family Center · USUniversity of New Mexico · US

Funding

The Together Everyone Achieves More Physical Activity Trial (TEAM-PA)R01HL160618 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA AT COLUMBIA · 2022 to 2025
$3.1M
Pilot and Feasibility ProgramP30DK092926 · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · 2025 to 2025
$779k
National Institutes of Health; National Heart, Lung, and Blood InstituteNHLBI NIH HHS F32 HL138928NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL160618NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK092926
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveMotivation is a barrier to physical activity (PA) among African American (AA) women, but past studies have implemented a "one-size-fits-all" approach and have not addressed differences in autonomous motivation. This pilot randomized controlled trial assessed the preliminary efficacy of "Developing Real Incentives and Volition for Exercise," a community- and theory-based intervention, which evaluated whether a motivationally matched (vs. a nonmatched) intervention increases daily total PA.

methodIn total, 68 AA women (50.72 ± 13.66 years; 86.8% with obesity) were randomized to an 8-week challenge-focused program (targeted toward high autonomous motivation) or rewards-focused program (targeted toward low autonomous motivation). Randomization was stratified by baseline autonomous motivation. FitBits were used during the intervention to promote self-monitoring (both programs) and social connectedness (challenge program only).

resultsBoth programs retained ≥ 80% of participants. Process evaluation revealed high attendance, dose, and fidelity (both programs). However, contrary to expectations, across all motivational levels (low and high autonomous), the challenge-focused intervention resulted in a greater increase in total daily PA (primary outcome), with an average increase of 17.9 min in the challenge-focused intervention versus an average decrease of 8.55 min in the rewards-focused intervention. An exploratory follow-up analysis revealed that engagement with the FitBit mobile app predicted greater PA at postintervention in the challenge-focused program.

conclusionsA team-based approach targeting social connectedness, enjoyment of PA, and positive intragroup competition is a promising approach for promoting PA among AA women. These findings are used to guide a discussion on best practices for engaging AA women in future behavioral interventions. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).

Indexed as

Black or African AmericanMotivationExerciseFemaleHumansPilot ProjectsVolition

Identifiers

PMID35834196
PMCPMC9669192
OpenAlexW4285495332

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.