ArticleAmerican journal of translational research2022
Clinical efficacy and safety of comprehensive nursing intervention in acute leukemia patients with myelosuppression after chemotherapy.
Article in American journal of translational research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pooled it
- Impact of evidence-based nursing on clinical outcomes in patients with leukemia undergoing chemotherapy.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Efficacy of comprehensive nursing in stabilizing perioperative hemodynamic indicators and reducing complications in patients under general anesthesia.American journal of translational research · 2025Article
- Continuity of care and 5E nursing intervention improve neurological function, quality of life, and prognosis for acute ischemic stroke patients.American journal of translational research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo investigate the clinical efficacy and safety of comprehensive nursing intervention in acute leukemia patients with myelosuppression after chemotherapy.
methodsEighty acute leukemia patients with myelosuppression after chemotherapy admitted to our hospital from April 2018 to December 2021 were selected and divided, according to the nursing mode, as the conventional group (n=40) with routine nursing mode and the comprehensive group (n=40) with the comprehensive nursing mode. Patients' anxiety (Self-Rating Anxiety Scale, SAS) scores, depression (Self-Rating Depression Scale, SDS) scores, occurrence of complications, nursing satisfaction, nursing experience, complaint rate, and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score were compared between the two groups so as to analyze the efficacy and safety of comprehensive nursing intervention. The improvement of quality of life in the two groups was observed and analyzed using the short form of quality of life measurement (WHOQOL-BREF). Logistic regression analysis was performed to analyze the risk factors for nosocomial infection in patients with comprehensive nursing intervention.
resultsNo statistically significant differences in SAS and SDS scores between the two groups were found prior nursing (P>0.05), while after nursing, scores in the two groups both decreased, with those in the comprehensive group significantly lower than in the conventional group (P<0.05). The incidence of complications after nursing in the comprehensive group was significantly lower than that in the conventional group, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). Nursing satisfaction of patients in the comprehensive group were significantly higher than that in the conventional group (P<0.05). After nursing, the nursing experience of the comprehensive group was significantly better than that of the conventional group (P<0.05); the complaint rate of the comprehensive group was significantly lower than that of the conventional group (P<0.05); before nursing, there was no significant difference in the VAS scores between the two groups of patients (P>0.05); after nursing, the VAS score of the comprehensive group was significantly lower than that of the conventional group (P<0.05). Before nursing, there was no significant difference in WHOQOL-BREF scores between the two groups (P>0.05); after nursing, the comprehensive group was higher than the conventional group. Among the 40 patients in the comprehensive nursing group, 15 patients developed infection. The number of neutrophils, age above 40, white blood cell count, hemoglobin content, high-intensity chemotherapy and glucocorticoid therapy were independent risk factors for nosocomial infection in patients with comprehensive nursing intervention (P<0.05).
conclusionComprehensive nursing intervention for patients with myelosuppression after chemotherapy for acute leukemia can effectively improve the patient's nursing experience, reduce the patient's complaint rate, alleviate the patient's physical pain, relieve the patient's anxiety, depression and other negative emotions, and reduce the patient's complications, suggesting that comprehensive nursing intervention exerts better clinical efficacy and has high safety, which merits promotion clinically.
Indexed as
Identifiers
35836903PMC9274587W4285614631What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.