ArticleComputational and mathematical methods in medicine2022
The Feasibility Mechanism of Nerve Interventional Thrombectomy for Occlusion of Cranial Artery M1 and M2 Segments.
Article in Computational and mathematical methods in medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Retracted: The Feasibility Mechanism of Nerve Interventional Thrombectomy for Occlusion of Cranial Artery M1 and M2 Segments.Computational and mathematical methods in medicine · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Retraction · 2023-09-20Concerns/Issues about Data · Concerns/Issues about Human Subject Welfare · Concerns/Issues about Referencing/Attributions · Concerns/Issues about Peer Review · Investigation by Journal/Publisher · Investigation by Third Party · Lack of IRB/IACUC Approval and/or Compliance · Unreliable Results and/or Conclusions ·
- Retracted
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study was aimed at exploring the feasibility and clinical efficacy of nerve interventional thrombectomy (NIT) to treat occlusion of cranial artery M1 and M2 segments. 80 patients were selected and rolled into a control group (intravenous thrombolysis) and an experimental group (NIT). Patients' vascular recanalization rates following therapy were compared, and the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) was used to measure neurological function. The improvement in hemodynamics and the occurrence of adverse responses were compared. The results showed that the experimental group's recanalization rate was up to 74.23%, which was significantly greater than the control group's (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.