ArticleJournal of oncology2022
Association between Blood Donation and Malignant and Benign Tumour Risk: A Population-Based Study of 3.4 Million Participants in China.
Article in Journal of oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Artificial Intelligence-based predictive models for adverse blood donor reactions: a systematic review of immediate and delayed events and clinical data approaches.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2026Pooled it
- Associations between whole blood donation and cancer incidence: a systematic review.BMC cancer · 2026Pooled it
- Comparison of trace elements in peripheral blood and bone marrow of newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients.Clinical and experimental medicine · 2024Article
- Exploration of the Healthy Donor Effect Among 0.6 Million Blood Donors in China: Longitudinal Study.JMIR public health and surveillance · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aims to identify the relationship between blood donation and malignant and benign tumour hospitalization risk. The cohort study was constructed in Shaanxi, China, to include blood donors and match nonblood donors one-to-one by gender, age, and county of residence. The study compared the hospitalization records of two groups from 2012 to 2018. A log-binomial regression model was used to estimate the relative risk (RR) of tumour risk between donors and nonblood donors among different age groups. A total of 1,625,599 donors were recruited (including 968,823 males) and compared with the matched nonblood donor group. Significantly lower risk of malignancy in males was found among donors (adjusted RR: 0.82, 95% CI: 0.75-0.92). Lower risks for specific types of tumours among donors were observed, including liver (0.42, [0.28-0.67]), lung (0.74, [0.59-0.87]), lymphoma (0.75, [0.62-0.85]), and oesophagus (0.55, [0.41-0.72]). However, the risk of brain cancer was higher among male donors (RR 1.19 [1.06-1.29]). Among female donors, lower risk of liver (0.57, [0.42-0.79]) and oesophagus malignancy (0.73, [0.62-0.88]) was observed. For benign tumours, male donors have a lower risk of benign skin tumour (0.79, [0.62-0.94]) and hemangioma and lymphangioma (0.75, [0.51-0.89]), while female donors have a lower risk in hemangioma and lymphangioma (0.65, [0.44-0.83]). We also found that the risk decreased with age among donors in the prevalence of tumours compared to that in nonblood donors (
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.