Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35847663›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in aging neuroscience2022

Establishment and Analysis of a Combined Diagnostic Model of Alzheimer's Disease With Random Forest and Artificial Neural Network.

Dazhong Sun, Haojun Peng, Zhibing Wu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in aging neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Colony Site Selection of Gray Heron (Ecology and evolution · 2025
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Construction of a diagnostic model based on random forest and artificial neural network for peri-implantitis.Hua xi kou qiang yi xue za zhi = Huaxi kouqiang yixue zazhi = West China journal of stomatology · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Dazhong SunThe First Clinical Medical School, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
Haojun PengThe First Clinical Medical School, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
Zhibing WuThe First Clinical Medical School, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a neurodegenerative condition that causes cognitive decline over time. Because existing diagnostic approaches for AD are limited, improving upon previously established diagnostic models based on genetic biomarkers is necessary. Firstly, four AD gene expression datasets were collected from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database. Two datasets were used to establish diagnostic models, and the other two datasets were used to verify the model effect. We merged GSE5281 with GSE44771 as the training dataset and found 120 DEGs. Then, we used random forest (RF) to screen 6 key genes (KLF15, MAFF, ITPKB, SST, DDIT4, and NRXN3) as being critical for separating AD and normal samples. The weights of these key genes were measured, and a diagnostic model was created using an artificial neural network (ANN). The area under the curve (AUC) of the model is 0.953, while the accuracy is 0.914. In the final step, two validation datasets were utilized to assess AUC performance. In GSE109887, our model had an AUC of 0.854, and in GSE132903, it had an AUC of 0.810. To summarize, we successfully identified key gene biomarkers and developed a new AD diagnostic model.

Indexed as

Alzheimer's diseaseartificial neural networkdiagnostic modelGEOrandom forest

Identifiers

PMID35847663
PMCPMC9280980

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.