Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35851462›Full record

ReviewCardiology clinics2022

Cardiovascular Health Care Implications of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Zahra Raisi-Estabragh, Mamas A Mamas

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cardiology clinics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Introduction to Mammalian Genome special issue: cardiovascular disease in the Mammalian Genome.Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. The impact of COVID-19 and COVID vaccination on cardiovascular outcomes.European heart journal supplements : journal of the European Society of Cardiology · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Zahra Raisi-EstabraghWilliam Harvey Research Institute, NIHR Barts Biomedical Research Centre, Queen Mary University, London EC1M 6BQ, United Kingdom; Barts Heart Centre, St Bartholomew's Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, West Smithfield, London EC1A 7BE, United Kingdom.
Mamas A MamasKeele Cardiovascular Research Group, Keele University, Keele ST5 5BG, United Kingdom; Department of Cardiology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA; Institute of Population Health, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PT, United kingdom. Electronic address: mamasmamas1@yahoo.co.uk.

Funding

British Heart Foundation FS/17/81/33318
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has challenged the capacity of health care systems around the world, including substantial disruptions to cardiovascular care across key areas of health care delivery. In this narrative review, we examine the implications of the COVID-19 pandemic for cardiovascular health care, including excess cardiovascular mortality, acute and elective cardiovascular care, and disease prevention. Additionally, we consider the long-term public health consequences of disruptions to cardiovascular care across both primary and secondary care settings. Finally, we review health care inequalities and their driving factors, as highlighted by the pandemic, and consider their importance in the context of cardiovascular health care.

Indexed as

COVID-19PandemicsHealthcare DisparitiesHumansSARS-CoV-2Cardiovascular diseaseCOVID-19Health care provisionHealth inequalitiesPopulation health

Identifiers

PMID35851462
PMCPMC8960181

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.