ArticleJAMA network open2022
Association of Optimal Gestational Weight Gain Ranges With Perinatal Outcomes Across Body Mass Index Categories in Twin Pregnancies.
Article in JAMA network open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.
- Gestational weight gain and perinatal outcomes in twin pregnancies: evidence-based insights from a Chinese population cohort.Annals of medicine · 2026Observational
- Haemoglobin Concentrations and Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes: Identifying Optimal Haemoglobin Ranges.Paediatric and perinatal epidemiology · 2026Article
- Article
- Associations between gestational weight gain and birthweight outcomes for women with systemic lupus erythematosus: based on a single-center retrospective cohort study.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2026Article
- Investigation of optimal range of gestational weight gain for twin pregnancies according to Chinese specific body mass index categories.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2026Article
- Interacting and joint effects of total gestational weight gain and the patterns on adverse pregnancy outcomes in twin pregnancy: a retrospective study.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2026Article
- What is known about gestational weight gain in Chinese twin pregnancies? A scoping review.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2026Article
- The impact of antenatal corticosteroids on respiratory and metabolic outcomes in late-preterm births depends on timing, number of courses, and singleton/twin status: a retrospective cohort study.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2026Article
- Association of gestational weight gain with adverse pregnancy outcomes across body mass index categories for twins in China.Frontiers in reproductive health · 2026Article
- Association between gestational weight change trajectories and perinatal outcomes in twin pregnancies in China.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2025Article
- Effect of gestational weight gain on adverse birth outcomes in twin pregnancies: a prospective cohort study in Chinese women.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2025Article
- Article
- Seeking the optimal gestational weight gain according to the pre-pregnancy body mass index: a cross-sectional study from Shanghai, China.European journal of clinical nutrition · 2025Article
- The Impact of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus on the Development of Preeclampsia in Twin Pregnancies: A Retrospective Cohort Study Conducted at a Tertiary Hospital.International journal of women's health · 2025Article
- Perceptual Factors Associated with Gestational Weight Gain: A Cross-Sectional Survey.Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing · 2024Article
- Opportunities and Limitations of Renal Denervation: Where Do We Stand?The American journal of medicine · 2024Review
- Article
- Optimal Gestational Weight Gain for Women with Gestational Diabetes Mellitus - China, 2011-2021.China CDC weekly · 2023Article
- Impact of Gestational Diabetes and Hypertension Disorders of Pregnancy on Neonatal Outcomes in Twin Pregnancies Based on Chorionicity.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- Gestational weight gain adequacy among twin pregnancies in France.Maternal & child nutrition · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: The existing gestational weight gain (GWG) recommendations for twin pregnancies are lacking for underweight individuals and are not stratified by obesity class. Objective: To identify optimal GWG ranges associated with reduced adverse perinatal outcomes stratified by prepregnancy body mass index (BMI) categories in twin pregnancies. Design, Setting and Participants: This population-based cohort study of twin pregnancies using data from the National Center for Health Statistics was conducted between January 1, 2014, and December 31, 2018. Statistical analysis was performed from October 24, 2021, to May 7, 2022. The study population comprised 262 604 individuals between 18 and 45 years of age with live-born twins without congenital malformation between 24 and 42 weeks of gestation. Two approaches were used to determine the optimal GWG ranges: a statistics-based approach calculating IQRs of GWG in a low-risk population, and an outcome-based approach identifying GWG thresholds below or above which an adverse perinatal outcome increased. Exposure: Gestational weight gain. Main Outcomes and Measures: Preterm birth less than 36 weeks, gestational hypertensive disorders, small for gestational age status, large for gestational age status, and a composite outcome defined as any occurrence of the individual outcomes. Results: The main sample comprised 200 810 individuals with twin pregnancies (mean [SD] maternal age, 30.4 [5.5] years; 1624 [0.8%] American Indian or Alaska Native, 13 031 [6.5%] Asian or Pacific Islander, 36 423 [18.1%] Black, and 149 732 [74.6%] White; and 137 409 [68.4%] multiparous). In the low-risk subgroup (n = 61 794), the IQRs of the total GWG after 36 weeks of gestation as assessed using a statistics-based approach and based on BMI group were 15.9 to 22.7 kg for underweight, 15.4 to 22.7 kg for normal weight, 12.7 to 22.2 kg for overweight, 10.0 to 20.0 kg for class 1 obesity, 7.7 to 18.1 kg for class 2 obesity, and 5.9 to 16.3 kg for class 3 obesity. The absolute risk of the composite outcome showed U-shaped associations with GWG across BMI categories. The optimal GWG ranges by 36 weeks identified using an outcome-based approach and BMI group were 17.5 to 24.9 kg for underweight, 15.0 to 24.9 kg for normal weight, 15.0 to 24.9 kg for overweight, 10.0 to 19.9 kg for class 1 obesity, 7.5 to 17.4 kg for class 2 obesity, and 5.0 to 9.9 kg for class 3 obesity. The multivariable logistic models assessed using the validation sample (n = 49 275) showed that GWG defined outside those optimal ranges was associated with preterm birth at less than 36 weeks, gestational hypertensive disorders, and small or large for gestational age. Conclusions and Relevance: This population-based cohort study found that optimal GWG ranges were similar for individuals with underweight and normal weight but decreased with increasing severity of obesity. The current US Institute of Medicine GWG recommendations may be too high for individuals with moderate or severe obesity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.