Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35852802›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2022

Association of Optimal Gestational Weight Gain Ranges With Perinatal Outcomes Across Body Mass Index Categories in Twin Pregnancies.

Dongxin Lin, Xuqiong Huang, Dazhi Fan, Gengdong Chen, Pengsheng Li, Jiaming Rao, Huishan Zhang, Xiaoling Guo, Caihong Luo, Zhengping Liu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Dongxin LinFoshan Institute of Fetal Medicine, Southern Medical University Affiliated Maternal and Child Health Hospital of Foshan, Foshan, Guangdong, China.
Xuqiong HuangMedical Administration Division, Affiliated Huadu Hospital, Southern Medical University (People's Hospital of Huadu District), Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Dazhi FanFoshan Institute of Fetal Medicine, Southern Medical University Affiliated Maternal and Child Health Hospital of Foshan, Foshan, Guangdong, China.
Gengdong ChenFoshan Institute of Fetal Medicine, Southern Medical University Affiliated Maternal and Child Health Hospital of Foshan, Foshan, Guangdong, China.
Pengsheng LiFoshan Institute of Fetal Medicine, Southern Medical University Affiliated Maternal and Child Health Hospital of Foshan, Foshan, Guangdong, China.
Jiaming RaoFoshan Institute of Fetal Medicine, Southern Medical University Affiliated Maternal and Child Health Hospital of Foshan, Foshan, Guangdong, China.
Huishan ZhangFoshan Institute of Fetal Medicine, Southern Medical University Affiliated Maternal and Child Health Hospital of Foshan, Foshan, Guangdong, China.
Xiaoling GuoDepartment of Obstetrics, Southern Medical University Affiliated Maternal and Child Health Hospital of Foshan, Foshan, Guangdong, China.
Caihong LuoDepartment of Obstetrics, Southern Medical University Affiliated Maternal and Child Health Hospital of Foshan, Foshan, Guangdong, China.
Zhengping LiuFoshan Institute of Fetal Medicine, Southern Medical University Affiliated Maternal and Child Health Hospital of Foshan, Foshan, Guangdong, China.
Foshan Maternity and Child Health Care Hospital · CNSouthern Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: The existing gestational weight gain (GWG) recommendations for twin pregnancies are lacking for underweight individuals and are not stratified by obesity class. Objective: To identify optimal GWG ranges associated with reduced adverse perinatal outcomes stratified by prepregnancy body mass index (BMI) categories in twin pregnancies. Design, Setting and Participants: This population-based cohort study of twin pregnancies using data from the National Center for Health Statistics was conducted between January 1, 2014, and December 31, 2018. Statistical analysis was performed from October 24, 2021, to May 7, 2022. The study population comprised 262 604 individuals between 18 and 45 years of age with live-born twins without congenital malformation between 24 and 42 weeks of gestation. Two approaches were used to determine the optimal GWG ranges: a statistics-based approach calculating IQRs of GWG in a low-risk population, and an outcome-based approach identifying GWG thresholds below or above which an adverse perinatal outcome increased. Exposure: Gestational weight gain. Main Outcomes and Measures: Preterm birth less than 36 weeks, gestational hypertensive disorders, small for gestational age status, large for gestational age status, and a composite outcome defined as any occurrence of the individual outcomes. Results: The main sample comprised 200 810 individuals with twin pregnancies (mean [SD] maternal age, 30.4 [5.5] years; 1624 [0.8%] American Indian or Alaska Native, 13 031 [6.5%] Asian or Pacific Islander, 36 423 [18.1%] Black, and 149 732 [74.6%] White; and 137 409 [68.4%] multiparous). In the low-risk subgroup (n = 61 794), the IQRs of the total GWG after 36 weeks of gestation as assessed using a statistics-based approach and based on BMI group were 15.9 to 22.7 kg for underweight, 15.4 to 22.7 kg for normal weight, 12.7 to 22.2 kg for overweight, 10.0 to 20.0 kg for class 1 obesity, 7.7 to 18.1 kg for class 2 obesity, and 5.9 to 16.3 kg for class 3 obesity. The absolute risk of the composite outcome showed U-shaped associations with GWG across BMI categories. The optimal GWG ranges by 36 weeks identified using an outcome-based approach and BMI group were 17.5 to 24.9 kg for underweight, 15.0 to 24.9 kg for normal weight, 15.0 to 24.9 kg for overweight, 10.0 to 19.9 kg for class 1 obesity, 7.5 to 17.4 kg for class 2 obesity, and 5.0 to 9.9 kg for class 3 obesity. The multivariable logistic models assessed using the validation sample (n = 49 275) showed that GWG defined outside those optimal ranges was associated with preterm birth at less than 36 weeks, gestational hypertensive disorders, and small or large for gestational age. Conclusions and Relevance: This population-based cohort study found that optimal GWG ranges were similar for individuals with underweight and normal weight but decreased with increasing severity of obesity. The current US Institute of Medicine GWG recommendations may be too high for individuals with moderate or severe obesity.

Indexed as

Gestational Weight GainHypertension, Pregnancy-InducedPregnancy ComplicationsPremature BirthAdultBody Mass IndexCohort StudiesFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornObesityOverweightPregnancyPregnancy OutcomePregnancy, Twin

Identifiers

PMID35852802
PMCPMC9297120
OpenAlexW4286220046

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.