Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35856792›Full record

ReviewThe British journal of radiology2022

Multidisciplinary management of spinal metastases: what the radiologist needs to know.

Sarah M Bahouth, Debra N Yeboa, Amol J Ghia, Claudio E Tatsui, Christopher A Alvarez-Breckenridge, Thomas H Beckham, Andrew J Bishio, Jing Li, Mary Frances McAleer, Robert Y North and 4 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The British journal of radiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Sarah M BahouthMusculoskeletal Imaging and Intervention Department, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston MA, USA.
Debra N YeboaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Amol J GhiaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Claudio E TatsuiDepartment of Neurosurgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Christopher A Alvarez-BreckenridgeDepartment of Neurosurgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Thomas H BeckhamDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Andrew J BishioDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Jing LiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Mary Frances McAleerDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Robert Y NorthDepartment of Neurosurgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Laurence D RhinesDepartment of Neurosurgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Todd A SwansonDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Wang ChenyangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Behrang AminiDepartment of Musculoskeletal Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4962-3466

Funding

Tumor Evolution and Metastasis ProgramP30CA016672 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI DIANE BODURKA · 1985 to 2026
$290.8M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016672
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The modern management of spinal metastases requires a multidisciplinary approach that includes radiation oncologists, surgeons, medical oncologists, and diagnostic and interventional radiologists. The diagnostic radiologist can play an important role in the multidisciplinary team and help guide assessment of disease and selection of appropriate therapy. The assessment of spine metastases is best performed on MRI, but imaging from other modalities is often needed. We provide a review of the clinical and imaging features that are needed by the multidisciplinary team caring for patients with spine metastases and stress the importance of the spine radiologist taking responsibility for synthesizing imaging features across multiple modalities to provide a report that advances patient care.

Indexed as

OncologistsSpinal NeoplasmsHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingRadiologistsSpine

Identifiers

PMID35856792
PMCPMC9815745

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.