Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35860402›Full record

ReviewComputational and structural biotechnology journal2022

Mini-review: Recent advances in post-translational modification site prediction based on deep learning.

Lingkuan Meng, Wai-Sum Chan, Lei Huang, Linjing Liu, Xingjian Chen, Weitong Zhang, Fuzhou Wang, Ke Cheng, Hongyan Sun, Ka-Chun Wong

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Computational and structural biotechnology journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Beyond evolution:Biosafety and health · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Nphos: Database and Predictor of Protein N-phosphorylation.Genomics, proteomics & bioinformatics · 2024
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Lingkuan MengDepartment of Computer Science, City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region.
Wai-Sum ChanDepartment of Computer Science, City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region.
Lei HuangDepartment of Computer Science, City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region.
Linjing LiuDepartment of Computer Science, City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region.
Xingjian ChenDepartment of Computer Science, City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region.
Weitong ZhangDepartment of Computer Science, City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region.
Fuzhou WangDepartment of Computer Science, City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region.
Ke ChengDepartment of Chemistry, City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region.
Hongyan SunDepartment of Chemistry, City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region.
Ka-Chun WongDepartment of Computer Science, City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Post-translational modifications (PTMs) are closely linked to numerous diseases, playing a significant role in regulating protein structures, activities, and functions. Therefore, the identification of PTMs is crucial for understanding the mechanisms of cell biology and diseases therapy. Compared to traditional machine learning methods, the deep learning approaches for PTM prediction provide accurate and rapid screening, guiding the downstream wet experiments to leverage the screened information for focused studies. In this paper, we reviewed the recent works in deep learning to identify phosphorylation, acetylation, ubiquitination, and other PTM types. In addition, we summarized PTM databases and discussed future directions with critical insights.

Indexed as

AAindex, Amino acid indexAc, AcetylationATP, Adenosine triphosphateAUC, Area under curveBE, Binary encodingBi-LSTM, Bidirectional LSTMBLOSUM, Blocks substitution matrixCKSAAP, Composition of k-spaced amino acid PairsCNN, Convolutional neural networkCNNOH, CNN with the one-hot encodingCNNrgb, CNN red green blueCNNWE, CNN with the word-embedding encodingCV, Cross-validationDC-CNN, Densely connected convolutional neural networkDeep learningDL, Deep learningDNNs, Deep neural networksEBGW, Encoding based on grouped weightE. coli, Escherichia coliEGAAC, Enhanced grouped amino acids contentIG, Information gainK, LysineKNN, k nearest neighborLASSO, Least absolute shrinkage and selection operatorLSTM, Long short-term memoryLSTMWE, LSTM with the word-embedding encodingMachine learningMass spectrometryMDCAN, Multilane dense convolutional attention networkMDC, Modular densely connected convolutional networksML, Machine learningMLP, Multilayer perceptronMMI, Multivariate mutual informationM.musculus, Mus musculusNMBroto, Normalized Moreau-Broto autocorrelationPh, PhosphorylationPost-translational modificationP, ProlinePredictionPseAAC, Pseudo-amino acid compositionPSP, PhosphoSitePlusPSSM, Position-specific scoring matrixPTM, Post-translational modificationsR, ArginineRF, Random forestRNN, Recurrent neural networkROC, Receiver operating characteristicS.cerevisiae, Saccharomyces cerevisiaeSE, Squeeze and excitationSEV, Split to Equal ValidationS, SerineST, Source and targetS. typhimurium, Salmonella typhimuriumSUMO, Small ubiquitin-like modifierSVM, Support vector machinesT, ThreonineUb, UbiquitinationY, TyrosineZSL, Zero-shot learning

Identifiers

PMID35860402
PMCPMC9284371

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.