Evidence mapPaperPMID 35862449Full record

SynthesisClinical pharmacology and therapeutics2022

Polygenic Risk Score and Statin Relative Risk Reduction for Primary Prevention of Myocardial Infarction in a Real-World Population.

Akinyemi Oni-Orisan, Tanushree Haldar, Mari A S Cayabyab, Dilrini K Ranatunga, Thomas J Hoffmann, Carlos Iribarren, Ronald M Krauss, Neil Risch

Open access · greenAbstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Polygenic risk scores in pharmacogenomics: methodological challenges, current applications, and perspectives for clinical implementation.Medizinische Genetik : Mitteilungsblatt des Berufsverbandes Medizinische Genetik e.V · 2026
    Article
  3. Polygenic risk scores for cardiovascular disease: clinical utility and limitations.The Egyptian heart journal : (EHJ) : official bulletin of the Egyptian Society of Cardiology · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Akinyemi Oni-Orisan *Department of Clinical Pharmacy, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5897-5543
Tanushree Haldar *Department of Clinical Pharmacy, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.
Mari A S CayabyabDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5345-6154
Dilrini K RanatungaKaiser Permanente Division of Research, Oakland, California, USA.
Thomas J HoffmannInstitute for Human Genetics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6893-4449
Carlos IribarrenKaiser Permanente Division of Research, Oakland, California, USA.
Ronald M Krauss *Department of Pediatrics, University of California San Francisco, Oakland, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4172-6815
Neil Risch *Institute for Human Genetics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.
University of California, San Francisco · USKaiser Permanente · US

Funding

Systems Genetics Dissection of Non-alcoholic SteatohepatitisR01DK117850 · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · 2025 to 2025
$654k
NHLBI NIH HHS K01 HL143109NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK117850NIGMS NIH HHS P50 GM115318
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genetic substudies of randomized controlled trials demonstrate that high coronary heart disease (CHD) polygenic risk score modifies statin CHD relative risk reduction; it is unknown if the association extends to statin users undergoing routine care. We sought to determine how statin effectiveness is modified by CHD polygenic risk score in a real-world cohort of participants without previous myocardial infarction. We determined CHD polygenic risk scores in participants of the Genetic Epidemiology Research on Adult Health and Aging (GERA) cohort. Covariate-adjusted Cox regression models were used to compare the risk of cardiovascular outcomes between statin users and matched nonusers. Statin effectiveness on incident myocardial infarction showed no gradient with increasing 10-year Pooled Cohort Equations atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risk across low, borderline, intermediate, and high ASCVD risk score groups. In contrast, statin effectiveness by polygenic risk was largest in the high polygenic risk score group (hazard ratio (HR) 0.41, 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.31-0.53; P = 1.5E-11), intermediate in the intermediate polygenic risk score group (HR 0.56, 95% CI, 0.47-0.66; P = 8.4E-12), and smallest in the low polygenic risk score group (HR 0.67, 95% CI, 0.47-0.97; P = 0.03; P for high vs. low = 0.01). ASCVD risk and statin low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) lowering did not differ across polygenic risk score groups. In patients undergoing routine care, CHD polygenic risk modified statin relative risk reduction of incident myocardial infarction independent of LDL-C lowering. Our findings extend prior work by identifying a subset (i.e., self-identified White individuals with low CHD polygenic risk scores) with attenuated clinical benefit from statins.

Indexed as

AtherosclerosisCoronary DiseaseHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase InhibitorsMyocardial InfarctionAdultCholesterol, LDLHumansPrimary PreventionRisk FactorsCholesterol, LDLHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID35862449
PMCPMC10112337
OpenAlexW4286500369

What Socratic holds

Texttitle and abstract
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.