Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35864227›Full record

ArticleNature ecology & evolution2022

Copy number changes in co-expressed odorant receptor genes enable selection for sensory differences in drosophilid species.

Thomas O Auer, Raquel Álvarez-Ocaña, Steeve Cruchet, Richard Benton, J Roman Arguello

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature ecology & evolution, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Receptor sequence divergence, gain, loss, duplication, and neofunctionalization drive olfactory adaptation inProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Genomic plasticity drives olfactory adaptation in a pest fly.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  5. Review
  6. High-resolution comparative single-cell transcriptomics ofbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. iScience · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Thomas O Auer *Center for Integrative Genomics, Faculty of Biology and Medicine, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3442-0567
Raquel Álvarez-Ocaña *Center for Integrative Genomics, Faculty of Biology and Medicine, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Steeve CruchetCenter for Integrative Genomics, Faculty of Biology and Medicine, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Richard BentonCenter for Integrative Genomics, Faculty of Biology and Medicine, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4305-8301
J Roman ArguelloDepartment of Ecology & Evolution, Faculty of Biology and Medicine, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland. roman.arguello@unil.ch.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7353-6023

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite numerous examples of chemoreceptor gene family expansions and contractions, how these relate to modifications in the sensory neuron populations in which they are expressed remains unclear. Drosophila melanogaster's odorant receptor (Or) family is ideal for addressing this question because most Ors are expressed in distinct olfactory sensory neuron (OSN) types. Between-species changes in Or copy number may therefore indicate increases or reductions in the number of OSN populations. Here we investigated the Or67a subfamily, which exhibits copy number variation in D. melanogaster and its closest relatives: D. simulans, D. sechellia and D. mauritiana. These species' common ancestor had three Or67a paralogues that had already diverged adaptively. Following speciation, two Or67a paralogues were lost independently in D. melanogaster and D. sechellia, with ongoing positive selection shaping the intact genes. Unexpectedly, the functionally diverged Or67a paralogues in D. simulans are co-expressed in a single neuron population, which projects to a glomerulus homologous to that innervated by Or67a neurons in D. melanogaster. Thus, while sensory pathway neuroanatomy is conserved, independent selection on co-expressed receptors has contributed to species-specific peripheral coding. This work reveals a type of adaptive change largely overlooked for olfactory evolution, raising the possibility that similar processes influence other cases of insect Or co-expression.

Indexed as

Drosophila ProteinsReceptors, OdorantAnimalsDNA Copy Number VariationsDrosophilaDrosophila melanogasterDrosophila ProteinsReceptors, Odorant

Identifiers

PMID35864227

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.