ArticleCureus2022
Coagulation Abnormalities and Risk Assessment in Acute Promyelocytic Leukemia: An Experience From a Resource-Constraint Country.
Article in Cureus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Establishment and Application of Warning Scoring System for Bleeding Severity in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Acute Promyelocytic Leukemia.Clinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/HemostasisArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction The objective of the study was to assess the impact of coagulopathy in risk-stratified acute promyelocytic leukemia (APML) patients irrespective of bleeding manifestation. Patients and methods This was a cross-sectional study design conducted at the National Institute of Blood Diseases and Bone Marrow Transplantation (NIBD & BMT) from November 2019 to December 2021. A total of 62 patients between three years to 74 years of age of either gender and treatment-naive cases of APML were included in the study. Morphological diagnosis was made on bone marrow samples, and confirmation was done by karyotyping/fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and/or polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Complete blood count (CBC), prothrombin time (PT), activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), D-dimer, and fibrinogen levels were done for bleeding risk assessment. Cases other than APML and cases on treatment were excluded from the study. Results A total of 85 APML patients were registered at our institute. Among them, 62 (73%) were included in the analysis as per the inclusion criteria of the study. The median age was 32 (3-74) years, with a male predominance of 34 (55%). According to the Sanz score, 18 (29%) patients were noted to have low risk; however, 22 (35.4%) patients were found to have an intermediate-risk disease and 22 (35.4%) patients had high-risk disease. There was positive bleeding history among 44 (71%) patients, followed by fever in 28 (45%) patients. Raised PT, APTT, and D-dimer were found in 46 (74%), 38 (61%), and 52(83.8%) patients, respectively. Low fibrinogen levels were observed among 16 (26%) patients. The association of risk stratification and bleeding history with CBC and coagulation parameters was observed. Platelet count and total leucocyte count were noted to be significantly associated with risk stratification. However, there was no association observed between the rest of the parameters with risk stratification and bleeding. Conclusion The results of our study suggest that regardless of bleeding symptoms, coagulation parameters must be investigated at the time of diagnosis in patients with suspected APML, and in addition to all-trans-retinoic acid (ATRA), transfusion of fresh frozen plasma should be done. It has clinical value, and adding it to the algorithm of treatment would be beneficial to the patients in the developing world, where resources are already meager.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.