ArticleJournal of oral biology and craniofacial research
Comparative evaluation of pain perception during conventional greater palatine injections versus the use of a novel barovibrotactile device - In vivo study.
Article in Journal of oral biology and craniofacial research. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Pain control by means of local anesthesia is an intrinsic part of clinical practice in dentistry. It is an irony that the modality used for pain free procedure itself is a source of fear & anxiety to the patient. Several modifications have been made to the injecting devices, local anesthetic solutions and techniques to render their administration comfortably. The objective of this study was thus designed to evaluate and compare anxiety and pain perception during conventional greater palatine injections versus use of a novel barovibrotactile device named Accupal to give painless anesthesia. This device has an additional attachment which works on Vibra-pulse technology thus minimizing pain during injection technique. Materials and methods: A prospective, split mouth, open label, randomized, crossover clinical study was conducted on 50 patients coming to our institute whereby on one side Accupal was used during administration of local anesthesia. And on other side, traditional local anesthetic injection technique was used with one week of time interval. Results: A statistically significant difference was found as in the pain perception between the two techniques as per Visual Analogue Scale whereas no difference was seen in the anxiety levels as per the physiological parameters recorded by noninvasive blood pressure machine at various intervals. Conclusion: The use of Accupal has thus proved to show better pain control as compared to traditional injection techniques of local anesthesia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.