Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35871676›Full record

ReviewClinical pharmacokinetics2022

Pharmacological Basis for Abrogating Myocardial Reperfusion Injury Through a Multi-Target Combined Antioxidant Therapy.

Daniel San-Martín-Martínez, Dayanara Serrano-Lemus, Vicente Cornejo, Abraham I J Gajardo, Ramón Rodrigo

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical pharmacokinetics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Efficacy and safety of levosimendan in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention: The LEVOCEST trial.Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions · 2024
    Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Daniel San-Martín-MartínezMolecular and Clinical Pharmacology Program, Institute of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Chile, Avda. Independencia 1027, CP 8380453, Santiago, Región Metropolitana, Chile.
Dayanara Serrano-LemusMolecular and Clinical Pharmacology Program, Institute of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Chile, Avda. Independencia 1027, CP 8380453, Santiago, Región Metropolitana, Chile.
Vicente CornejoMolecular and Clinical Pharmacology Program, Institute of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Chile, Avda. Independencia 1027, CP 8380453, Santiago, Región Metropolitana, Chile.
Abraham I J GajardoMolecular and Clinical Pharmacology Program, Institute of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Chile, Avda. Independencia 1027, CP 8380453, Santiago, Región Metropolitana, Chile.
Ramón RodrigoMolecular and Clinical Pharmacology Program, Institute of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Chile, Avda. Independencia 1027, CP 8380453, Santiago, Región Metropolitana, Chile. rrodrigo@med.uchile.cl.ORCID 0000-0003-1724-571X
University of Chile · CL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The main goal of the treatment for acute myocardial infarction is to achieve reperfusion of the affected myocardial tissue, with percutaneous coronary angioplasty being the gold standard procedure. However, this strategy has been associated with additional heart damage termed "lethal reperfusion injury," which is responsible for up to half of the final infarct size. Among the possible underlying mechanisms that are likely to explain this damage, studies suggest that oxidative stress plays a key role. Although this has not been translated into clinical benefits in most studies, recent preclinical studies reported promising results and a possible synergy with the combined use of vitamin C (VC), N-acetylcysteine (NAC), and deferoxamine (DFO). However, to implement a combined therapy with these drugs for patients requires further studies to understand their pharmacokinetic properties. Available data of the clinical trials have not been validated by looking into the pharmacokinetics in their design. Therefore, this article presents an update and comparison of the evidence for the efficacy of these administration schemes for each drug in cardioprotection, their pharmacokinetic properties and mechanisms of action for their use against "lethal reperfusion injury." To achieve a cardioprotective effect using a new pharmacological strategy before the onset of reperfusion, it is helpful to consider the pharmacokinetics of each drug. In this regard, to design a fast and short pharmacologic therapeutic strategy, theoretically VC and DFO concentrations could be modeled by a one-compartment model whereas NAC could be modeled by a three-compartment model with an initial short half-life.

Indexed as

Myocardial InfarctionMyocardial Reperfusion InjuryAntioxidantsHumansAntioxidants

Identifiers

PMID35871676
OpenAlexW4286945397

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.