Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35872870›Full record

ReviewBioMed research international2022

Progression Rate of Visual Function and Affecting Factors at Different Stages of Retinitis Pigmentosa.

Nana Ito, Gen Miura, Yuki Shiko, Yohei Kawasaki, Takayuki Baba, Shuichi Yamamoto

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BioMed research international, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Nana ItoDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba, Japan.
Gen MiuraDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6288-8840
Yuki ShikoBiostatistics Section, Clinical Research Centre, Chiba University Hospital, Chiba, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3959-9343
Yohei KawasakiFaculty of Nursing, Japanese Red Cross College of Nursing, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7474-7647
Takayuki BabaDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8178-8391
Shuichi YamamotoDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We reviewed medical records of 121 patients/235 eyes of typical retinitis pigmentosa (RP) patients who could be followed up for at least 5 years with the aim of investigating the long-term course of visual function progression at each RP stage and appropriate assessment methods. Patients were classified into three groups: mild RP (baseline mean deviation (MD) ≥ -5), moderate RP (-25 < baseline MD < -5), and late RP (baseline MD ≤ -25). Linear mixed-effect models were used to follow MD, the average retinal sensitivity of the central four points of the Humphrey field analyzer 10-2 program (S4), and visual acuity (VA) with increasing time. The associations among factors (baseline MD group, sex, hereditary form) and the interaction between each factor and time were also investigated. The mean reduction of the MD, S4, and VA for all patients was -0.37 dB/year, -0.25 dB/year, and 0.018/year, respectively. The moderate RP group had a faster progression than other groups in MD (-0.43 dB/year,

Indexed as

Retinitis PigmentosaVisual FieldsFemaleHumansMaleRetinaVisual AcuityVisual Field Tests

Identifiers

PMID35872870
PMCPMC9303139

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.