Evidence mapPaperPMID 35873544Full record

ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2022

Gingerol-Enriched Ginger Supplementation Mitigates Neuropathic Pain

Chwan-Li Shen, Rui Wang, Vadim Yakhnitsa, Julianna Maria Santos, Carina Watson, Takaki Kiritoshi, Guangchen Ji, Abdul Naji Hamood, Volker Neugebauer

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06817018 (Ginger and the Microbiota-gut-brain Connection in Sciatic Pain Individuals), which is not on this map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06817018 phase2recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Ginger and the Microbiota-gut-brain Connection in Sciatic Pain Individuals

TypeinterventionalSponsorLeslie ShenRan2025 to 2028Enrolled80ConditionsNeuropathic Pain, Sciatic PainArmsPlacebo, Ginger
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. 8-Gingerol Mitigates MPPNeurochemical research · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Chwan-Li ShenDepartment of Pathology, Lubbock, TX, United States.
Rui WangDepartment of Pathology, Lubbock, TX, United States.
Vadim YakhnitsaDepartment of Pharmacology and Neuroscience, Lubbock, TX, United States.
Julianna Maria SantosDepartment of Pathology, Lubbock, TX, United States.
Carina WatsonDepartment of Medical Education, Lubbock, TX, United States.
Takaki KiritoshiDepartment of Pharmacology and Neuroscience, Lubbock, TX, United States.
Guangchen JiDepartment of Pharmacology and Neuroscience, Lubbock, TX, United States.
Abdul Naji HamoodDepartment of Microbiology and Infectious Disease, Lubbock, TX, United States.
Volker NeugebauerCenter of Excellence for Integrative Health, Lubbock, TX, United States.

Funding

PAIN, NOCICEPTION, AND THE AMYGDALAR01NS038261 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MEDICAL BR GALVESTON · 1999 to 2025
$5.0M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS038261
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

animalscentral nervous systemfunctional foodleaky gutpain assessment

Identifiers

PMID35873544
PMCPMC9305072

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.