Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35874552›Full record

ArticleNutrition bulletin2021

UK Nutrition Research Partnership (NRP) workshop: Forum on advancing dietary intake assessment.

Anne de la Hunty, Judith Buttriss, John Draper, Helen Roche, Georgia Levey, Ana Florescu, Naomi Penfold, Gary Frost

Abstract readNews
In one paragraph

Article in Nutrition bulletin, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Diet and the microbiota - gut - brain-axis: a primer for clinical nutrition.Current opinion in clinical nutrition and metabolic care · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Anne de la HuntyBritish Nutrition Foundation London UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1403-5434
Judith ButtrissBritish Nutrition Foundation London UK.
John DraperInstitute of Biological Environmental and Rural Sciences Aberystwyth University Aberystwyth UK.
Helen RocheUniversity College Dublin Dublin Ireland.
Georgia LeveyImperial College London London UK.
Ana FlorescuScience Practice Ltd London UK.
Naomi PenfoldScience Practice Ltd London UK.
Gary FrostImperial College London London UK.

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/J010308/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The development of better and more robust measures of dietary intake in free living situations was identified as a priority for advancing nutrition research by the Office of Strategic Coordination for Health Research (OSCHR) Review of Nutrition and Human Health Research in 2017. The UK Nutrition Research Partnership (NRP) sponsored a workshop on Dietary Intake Assessment methodology alongside its series of 'Hot Topic' workshops designed to accelerate progress in nutrition research by bringing together people from a range of different disciplines. The workshop on Dietary Intake Assessment methodology took place via Zoom over two half-days in January 2021 and included 50 scientists from a wide range of disciplines. The problems with current methods of dietary assessment and how emerging technologies might address them were set out in pre-recorded presentations and explored in panel discussions. Participants then worked in breakout groups to discuss and prioritise the research questions that should be addressed to best further the field and lead to improvements in dietary assessment methodology. Five priority research questions were selected. Participants were asked to brainstorm potential approaches for addressing them and were then asked to focus on one approach and develop it further. At the end of these sessions, participants presented their project ideas to the rest of the workshop and these will be reported back to the Medical Research Council. It is hoped that potential collaborative projects arising from these discussions will be taken forward in response to future funding calls.

Indexed as

biomarkersdietary assessment methodsmulti‐disciplinaryresearchwearable technology

Identifiers

PMID35874552
PMCPMC9290602

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.