Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35879836›Full record

ArticleHistopathology2022

The frequency and clinical significance of centromere enumeration probe 17 alterations in human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 immunohistochemistry-equivocal invasive breast cancer.

Ayaka Katayama, Jane Starczynski, Michael S Toss, Abeer M Shaaban, Elena Provenzano, Cecily M Quinn, Grace Callagy, Colin A Purdie, Rebecca Millican-Slater, David Purnell and 7 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Histopathology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 12 institutions in 4 countries.

Ayaka KatayamaTranslational Medical Sciences Unit, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8667-158X
Jane StarczynskiDepartment of Cellular Pathology, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Edgebaston, Birmingham, UK.
Michael S TossTranslational Medical Sciences Unit, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Abeer M ShaabanDepartment of Cellular Pathology, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Edgebaston, Birmingham, UK.
Elena ProvenzanoDepartment of Histopathology, Cambridge University NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3345-3965
Cecily M QuinnDepartment of Histopathology, St. Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, and School of Medicine, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
Grace CallagyDiscipline of Pathology, School of Medicine, Lambe Institute for Translational Research, NUI, Galway, Ireland.
Colin A PurdieDepartment of Breast Pathology, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, Dundee, UK.
Rebecca Millican-SlaterDepartment of Histopathology, St James's University Hospital, Leeds, UK.
David PurnellHistopathology Department, University Hospitals of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
Leena ChaglaBurney Breast Unit, St Helens and Knowsley Teaching Hospital NHS Trust, Prescot, UK.
Tetsunari OyamaDiagnostic Pathology, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine, Maebashi, Japan.
Sarah E PinderDivision of Cancer Studies, King's College London, Guy's Hospital, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4167-8910
Steve ChanDepartment of Oncology, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK.
Ian EllisTranslational Medical Sciences Unit, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Andrew H S LeeDepartment of Histopathology, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, City Hospital Nottingham, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2496-4050
Emad A RakhaTranslational Medical Sciences Unit, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5009-5525
Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust · GBUniversity Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity of Nottingham · GBCambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust · GBGunma University · JPGuy's Hospital · GBNinewells Hospital · GBOllscoil na Gaillimhe – University of Galway · IESt Helens and Knowsley Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust · GBSt James's University Hospital · GBUniversity College Dublin · IEUniversity Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimsChromosome 17 alterations affect the assessment of HER2 gene amplification in breast cancer (BC), but its clinical significance remains unclear. This study aimed to identify the prevalence of centromere enumeration probe 17 (CEP17) alterations, and its correlation with response to neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) in BC patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) immunohistochemistry-equivocal score. METHODS AND

resultsA large BC cohort (n = 6049) with HER2 immunohistochemistry score 2+ and florescent in-situ hybridisation (FISH) results was included to assess the prevalence of CEP17 alterations. Another cohort (n = 885) with available clinicopathological data was used to evaluate the effect of CEP17 in the setting of NAT. HER2-amplified tumours with monosomy 17 (CEP17 copy number < 1.5 per nucleus), normal 17 (CEP17 1.5-< 3.0) and polysomy 17 (CEP17 ≥ 3.0) were observed in 16, 59 and 25%, respectively, compared with 3, 74 and 23%, respectively, in HER2-non-amplified tumours. There was no significant relationship between CEP17 alterations and pathological complete response (pCR) rate in both HER2-amplified and HER2-non-amplified tumours. The independent predictors of pCR were oestrogen (ER) negativity in HER2-amplified tumours [ER negative versus positive; odds ratio (OR) = 11.80; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.37-102.00; P = 0.02], and histological grade 3 in HER2 non-amplified tumours (3 versus 1, 2; OR = 5.54; 95% CI = 1.61-19.00; P = 0.007).

conclusionThe impacts of CEP17 alterations are not as strong as those of HER2/CEP17 ratio and HER2 copy number. The hormonal receptors status and tumour histological grade are more useful to identify BC patients with a HER2 immunohistochemistry-equivocal score who would benefit from NAT.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsChromosome AberrationsCentromereChromosomes, Human, Pair 17Erb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesFemaleGene AmplificationHumansImmunohistochemistryIn Situ Hybridization, FluorescenceERBB2 protein, humanErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine Kinasesalterationsbreast cancerCEP17chromosome 17HER2

Identifiers

PMID35879836
PMCPMC9545957
OpenAlexW4287879581

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.