Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35882737›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental science and pollution research international2022

Applying a deep residual network coupling with transfer learning for recyclable waste sorting.

Kunsen Lin, Youcai Zhao, Xiaofeng Gao, Meilan Zhang, Chunlong Zhao, Lu Peng, Qian Zhang, Tao Zhou

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Kunsen LinThe State Key Laboratory of Pollution Control and Resource Reuse, College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Tongji University, 1239 Siping Road, Shanghai, 200092, China.
Youcai ZhaoThe State Key Laboratory of Pollution Control and Resource Reuse, College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Tongji University, 1239 Siping Road, Shanghai, 200092, China.
Xiaofeng GaoKey Laboratory of the Three Gorges Reservoir Region's Eco-Environment, Ministry of Education, College of Environment and Ecology, Chongqing University, Chongqing, 400045, China. gaoxiaofeng@cqu.edu.cn.
Meilan ZhangThe State Key Laboratory of Pollution Control and Resource Reuse, College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Tongji University, 1239 Siping Road, Shanghai, 200092, China.
Chunlong ZhaoThe State Key Laboratory of Pollution Control and Resource Reuse, College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Tongji University, 1239 Siping Road, Shanghai, 200092, China.
Lu PengThe State Key Laboratory of Pollution Control and Resource Reuse, College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Tongji University, 1239 Siping Road, Shanghai, 200092, China.
Qian ZhangRobert M. Buchan Department of Mining, Queen's University, Kingston, K7L 3N6, Canada.
Tao ZhouThe State Key Laboratory of Pollution Control and Resource Reuse, College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Tongji University, 1239 Siping Road, Shanghai, 200092, China.

Funding

the National Key R&D Program of China No. 2018YFC1901400the National Natural Science Foundation of China No. 51878470the National Natural Science Foundation of China No. 52000143
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recyclable waste sorting has become a key step for promoting the development of a circular economy with the gradual realization of carbon neutrality around the world. This study aims to develop an intelligent and efficient method for recyclable waste sorting by the method of deep learning. Thus, RWNet models, which refers to various ResNet structures (ResNet-18, ResNet-34, ResNet-50, ResNet-101, and ResNet-152) based on transfer learning, were proposed to classify different types of recyclable waste. Cyclical learning rate and data augmentation were taken to improve the performance of RWNet models. In addition, accuracy, precision, recall, F1 score, and ROC were taken to evaluate the performance of RWNet models. Results showed that the accuracy of various RWNet models is almost at 88%, and the best accuracy is 88.8% in RWNet-152. The highest precision, recall, and F1 score in terms of weighted average value appeared in RWNet-101 (89.9%), RWNet-152 (88.8%), and RWNet-152 (88.9%), respectively. The area under the ROC curve (AUC) is higher than 0.9, except for the AUC value of plastic (0.85), which indicated that most of the recyclable waste can be well sorted by RWNet models. This study demonstrates the good performance of RWNet models that can be used to automatically sort most of the recyclable waste, which paves the way for better recyclable waste management.

Indexed as

CarbonCell MovementMachine LearningProtein TransportCarbonDeep learningRecyclable wasteTransfer learningWaste classificationWaste management

Identifiers

PMID35882737
PMCPMC9323877

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.