Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35886003›Full record

ArticleGenes2022

Multi-Cell-Type Openness-Weighted Association Studies for Trait-Associated Genomic Segments Prioritization.

Shuang Song, Hongyi Sun, Jun S Liu, Lin Hou

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genes, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 91% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Shuang SongCenter for Statistical Science, Department of Industrial Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China.
Hongyi SunCenter for Statistical Science, Department of Industrial Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China.
Jun S LiuDepartment of Statistics, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4450-7239
Lin HouCenter for Statistical Science, Department of Industrial Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China.
Tsinghua University · CNHarvard University · US

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_PC_17228Medical Research Council MC_QA137853Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Openness-weighted association study (OWAS) is a method that leverages the in silico prediction of chromatin accessibility to prioritize genome-wide association studies (GWAS) signals, and can provide novel insights into the roles of non-coding variants in complex diseases. A prerequisite to apply OWAS is to choose a trait-related cell type beforehand. However, for most complex traits, the trait-relevant cell types remain elusive. In addition, many complex traits involve multiple related cell types. To address these issues, we develop OWAS-joint, an efficient framework that aggregates predicted chromatin accessibility across multiple cell types, to prioritize disease-associated genomic segments. In simulation studies, we demonstrate that OWAS-joint achieves a greater statistical power compared to OWAS. Moreover, the heritability explained by OWAS-joint segments is higher than or comparable to OWAS segments. OWAS-joint segments also have high replication rates in independent replication cohorts. Applying the method to six complex human traits, we demonstrate the advantages of OWAS-joint over a single-cell-type OWAS approach. We highlight that OWAS-joint enhances the biological interpretation of disease mechanisms, especially for non-coding regions.

Indexed as

Genome-Wide Association StudyPolymorphism, Single NucleotideChromatinGenomicsHumansPhenotypeChromatinaggregated Cauchy association testchromatin accessibilitymultiple cell types

Identifiers

PMID35886003
PMCPMC9323627
OpenAlexW4284889510

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.