ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2022
Genetic Background Matters: Population-Based Studies in Model Organisms for Translational Research.
Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Rapamycin Pharmacogenomic Approach for the Childhood Dementia Niemann-Pick C.Journal of inherited metabolic disease · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence Across the Drug Development Lifecycle.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Natural Genetic Variation Impacts Stress-Induced Quiescence and Regeneration in Response to Rapamycin.Cells · 2026Article
- Rapamycin Differentially Impacts Germline Stem Cell Quiescence Across Diverse Genetic Backgrounds ofbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Human-based complexFrontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2025Review
- Beyond genomic studies of congenital heart defects through systematic modelling and phenotyping.Disease models & mechanisms · 2024Article
- Understanding the phenotypic variability in Niemann-Pick disease type C (NPC): a need for precision medicine.NPJ genomic medicine · 2023Review
- A Mouse Systems Genetics Approach Reveals Common and Uncommon Genetic Modifiers of Hepatic Lysosomal Enzyme Activities and Glycosphingolipids.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- Protective Effects of a Polyphenol-Rich Blueberry Extract on Adult Human Neural Progenitor Cells.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Differences in Diurnal Rhythm of Rod Outer Segment Renewal between 129T2/SvEmsJ and C57BL/6J Mice.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We are all similar but a bit different. These differences are partially due to variations in our genomes and are related to the heterogeneity of symptoms and responses to treatments that patients exhibit. Most animal studies are performed in one single strain with one manipulation. However, due to the lack of variability, therapies are not always reproducible when treatments are translated to humans. Panels of already sequenced organisms are valuable tools for mimicking human phenotypic heterogeneities and gene mapping. This review summarizes the current knowledge of mouse, fly, and yeast panels with insightful applications for translational research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.