ArticleNutrients2022
Development and Validation of an Insulin Resistance Model for a Population with Chronic Kidney Disease Using a Machine Learning Approach.
Article in Nutrients, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.
- Assessment of Machine Learning Model Performance for Clinical Prediction of Insulin Resistance in the Study of Cardiovascular Risk in Adolescents-ERICA.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Detection and classification of medical images using deep learning for chronic kidney disease.International urology and nephrology · 2026Article
- Exploring the association between volatile organic compound exposure and chronic kidney disease: evidence from explainable machine learning methods.Renal failure · 2025Article
- Association between triglyceride glucose body mass index and the prognosis of patients with atrial fibrillation complicated with acute coronary syndrome: a prospective study.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2025Article
- AI-driven prediction of insulin resistance in non-diabetic populations using minimal invasive tests: comparing models and criteria.Diabetology & metabolic syndrome · 2025Article
- Prediction of Insulin Resistance in Nondiabetic Population Using LightGBM and Cohort Validation of Its Clinical Value: Cross-Sectional and Retrospective Cohort Study.JMIR medical informatics · 2025Article
- Effects of Various Heavy Metal Exposures on Insulin Resistance in Non-diabetic Populations: Interpretability Analysis from Machine Learning Modeling Perspective.Biological trace element research · 2024Article
- Evaluating the impact of chronic kidney disease and the triglyceride-glucose index on cardiovascular disease: mediation analysis in the NHANES.BMC public health · 2024Article
- Chronic kidney disease combined with metabolic syndrome is a non-negligible risk factor.Therapeutic advances in endocrinology and metabolism · 2024Review
- Development and validation of machine learning-augmented algorithm for insulin sensitivity assessment in the community and primary care settings: a population-based study in China.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2024Article
- Association of systemic inflammation response index with all-cause mortality as well as cardiovascular mortality in patients with chronic kidney disease.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2024Article
- Discriminating insulin resistance in middle-aged nondiabetic women using machine learning approaches.AIMS public health · 2024Article
- Appropriate sleep duration modifying the association of insulin resistance and hepatic steatosis is varied in different status of metabolic disturbances among adults from the United States, NHANES 2017-March 2020.Preventive medicine reports · 2023Article
- Diabetes Mellitus in Pancreatic Cancer: A Distinct Approach to Older Subjects with New-Onset Diabetes Mellitus.Cancers · 2023Review
- Development and validation of an insulin resistance model for a population without diabetes mellitus and its clinical implication: a prospective cohort study.EClinicalMedicine · 2023Article
- A Hybrid Risk Factor Evaluation Scheme for Metabolic Syndrome and Stage 3 Chronic Kidney Disease Based on Multiple Machine Learning Techniques.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- A Catalogue of Machine Learning Algorithms for Healthcare Risk Predictions.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Simple Method to Predict Insulin Resistance in Children Aged 6-12 Years by Using Machine Learning.Diabetes, metabolic syndrome and obesity : targets and therapy · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a complex syndrome without a definitive treatment. For these patients, insulin resistance (IR) is associated with worse renal and patient outcomes. Until now, no predictive model using machine learning (ML) has been reported on IR in CKD patients. Methods: The CKD population studied was based on results from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) of the USA from 1999 to 2012. The homeostasis model assessment of IR (HOMA-IR) was used to assess insulin resistance. We began the model building process via the ML algorithm (random forest (RF), eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGboost), logistic regression algorithms, and deep neural learning (DNN)). We compared different receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves from different algorithms. Finally, we used SHAP values (SHapley Additive exPlanations) to explain how the different ML models worked. Results: In this study population, 71,916 participants were enrolled. Finally, we analyzed 1,229 of these participants. Their data were segregated into the IR group (HOMA IR > 3, n = 572) or non-IR group (HOMR IR ≤ 3, n = 657). In the validation group, RF had a higher accuracy (0.77), specificity (0.81), PPV (0.77), and NPV (0.77). In the test group, XGboost had a higher AUC of ROC (0.78). In addition, XGBoost also had a higher accuracy (0.7) and NPV (0.71). RF had a higher accuracy (0.7), specificity (0.78), and PPV (0.7). In the RF algorithm, the body mass index had a much larger impact on IR (0.1654), followed by triglyceride (0.0117), the daily calorie intake (0.0602), blood HDL value (0.0587), and age (0.0446). As for the SHAP value, in the RF algorithm, almost all features were well separated to show a positive or negative association with IR. Conclusion: This was the first study using ML to predict IR in patients with CKD. Our results showed that the RF algorithm had the best AUC of ROC and the best SHAP value differentiation. This was also the first study that included both macronutrients and micronutrients. We concluded that ML algorithms, particularly RF, can help determine risk factors and predict IR in patients with CKD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.