ArticlePharmaceutics2022
Comparative Characterization of Different Molecular Formats of Bispecific Antibodies Targeting EGFR and PD-L1.
Article in Pharmaceutics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Physicochemical and biological characterization of a bispecific antibody in a CrossMab/KIH format that targets EGFR and VEGF-A.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Article
- Investigation of the potential effects of estrogen receptor modulators on immune checkpoint molecules.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Structural and functional characterization of IgG- and non-IgG-based T-cell-engaging bispecific antibodies.Frontiers in immunology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We generated two IgG1-like bispecific antibodies (BsAbs) with different molecular formats, symmetrical DVD-Ig and asymmetrical knob-in-hole (KIH), targeting the same antigens, EGFR and PD-L1 (designated as anti-EGFR/PD-L1). We performed the physiochemical and biological characterization of these two formats of anti-EGFR/PD-L1 BsAbs and compared some key quality attributes and biological activities of these two formats of BsAbs. Physiochemical binding characterization data demonstrated that both formats bound EGFR and PD-L1. However, the binding affinity of the KIH format was weaker than the DVD-Ig format in Biacore binding assays. In contrast, both DVD-Ig and KIH BsAbs had similar ELISA and cell surface binding activities, comparable to mAbs. Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) cells and a xenograft model were used to test the potency of BsAbs and other biological activities. Results showed that anti-EGFR/PD-L1 BsAbs exhibited in vitro and in vivo antitumor proliferation activity, but there was a difference in the potencies of the respective BsAb formats (DVD-Ig and KIH) when different cells or assays were used. This study provides evidence that the potency of the BsAbs targeting the same antigens can be affected by the respective molecular features, and selection of appropriate cell lines and assays is critically important for the assay development and potency testing of BsAbs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.