Evidence mapPaperPMID 35892115Full record

ReviewJournal of exercise science and fitness2022

The effects of nitrate ingestion on high-intensity endurance time-trial performance: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Tak Hiong Wong, Alexiaa Sim, Stephen F Burns

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of exercise science and fitness, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Tak Hiong WongPhysical Education and Sports Science, National Institute of Education, Nanyang Technological University, 1 Nanyang Walk, 637616, Singapore.
Alexiaa SimPhysical Education and Sports Science, National Institute of Education, Nanyang Technological University, 1 Nanyang Walk, 637616, Singapore.
Stephen F BurnsPhysical Education and Sports Science, National Institute of Education, Nanyang Technological University, 1 Nanyang Walk, 637616, Singapore.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background/Objective: Dietary nitrate ingestion extends endurance capacity, but data supporting endurance time-trial performance are unclear. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the evidence for dietary nitrate supplementation to improve high-intensity endurance time-trial performance over 5-30 min on the premise that nitrate may alleviate peripheral fatigue over shorter durations. Methods: A systematic literature search and data extraction was carried out following PRISMA guidelines and the PICOS framework within five databases: PubMed, ProQuest, ScienceDirect, Scopus and SPORTDiscus. Search terms used were: (nitrate OR nitrite OR beetroot) AND (high intensity OR all out) AND (time trial or total work done) AND performance. Results: Twenty-four studies were included. Fifteen studies applied an acute supplementation strategy (4.1 mmol-15.2 mmol serving on one day), eight chronic supplementation (4.0 mmol-13.0 mmol per day over 3-15 days), and one applied both acute and chronic supplementation (8.0 mmol on one day and over 15 days). Standardised mean difference for time-trial ranging from 5 to 30 min showed an overall trivial effect in favour of nitrate (Hedges'g = 0.15, 95% CI -0.00 to 0.31, Z = 1.95, Conclusion: Chronic nitrate supplementation improves time-trial performance ranging from 5 to 30 min.

Indexed as

Endurance performanceNitrateNitric oxideNitrite

Identifiers

PMID35892115
PMCPMC9287610

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.