Evidence mapPaperPMID 35897259Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022

Socioeconomic Inequalities in the Prevalence of Diabetes in Argentina: A Repeated Cross-Sectional Study in Urban Women and Men.

Carlos Rojas-Roque, Akram Hernández-Vásquez, Diego Azañedo, Guido Bendezu-Quispe

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07621419 (New Formulation of Semaglutide in the Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes in Argentina), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07621419 recruitingstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

New Formulation of Semaglutide in the Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes in Argentina: a Prospective, Multicenter, Real-world Study

Ran2025Enrolled145Registered outcomes11Posted comparisons0ConditionsDiabetes MellitusArmssemaglutide
Open the trial in the graph
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Carlos Rojas-RoqueHealth Technology Assessment and Health Economics Department, Institute for Clinical Effectiveness and Health Policy, Buenos Aires C1414CPV, Argentina.ORCID 0000-0002-1474-1550
Akram Hernández-VásquezCentro de Excelencia en Investigaciones Económicas y Sociales en Salud, Vicerrectorado de Investigación, Universidad San Ignacio de Loyola, Lima 15024, Peru.ORCID 0000-0003-1431-2526
Diego AzañedoFacultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad Científica del Sur, Lima 15067, Peru.ORCID 0000-0003-1375-8788
Guido Bendezu-QuispeCentro de Investigación Epidemiológica en Salud Global, Universidad Privada Norbert Wiener, Lima 15046, Peru.ORCID 0000-0002-5140-0843

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study measured the socioeconomic inequalities in the prevalence of diabetes between 2005 and 2018 in an urban Argentinian population. Data were obtained from the repeated cross-sectional surveys “National Survey of Risk Factors” (ENFR is its acronym in Spanish). From 2005 to 2018, four rounds of ENFR were administered to men and women over 18 years of age. Concentration curves (CC) and the Erreygers concentration index (ECI) were used to describe the socioeconomic inequalities in diabetes’ prevalence. A decomposition analysis was performed to determine the contribution of each variable to inequality in diabetes’ prevalence. Data from 41,219 (2005), 34,583 (2009), 32,232 (2013), and 29,094 (2018) individuals were analyzed. Women reported a greater prevalence of diabetes compared with men for all the years included. According to the CC and ECI, we found no evidence of inequality in men throughout all study years. For women, throughout all years, the CCs were above the line of equity, and the ECIs during all the years were negative and different from zero (p < 0.01). For women, we found no evidence of a reduction in inequalities between 2005 and 2018 (p = 0.475). The socioeconomic inequality for women was largely driven by public insurance, primary and secondary education, and employment. Diabetes’ prevalence was not associated with socioeconomic status in men, while the prevalence of diabetes in women was more concentrated among poorer women. During the 13 years, there was no evidence of a reduction of inequality in women, noting that interventions must prioritize and should focus on the main contribution of inequalities, such as education and employment.

Indexed as

Diabetes MellitusAdolescentAdultArgentinaCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHealth Status DisparitiesHumansMalePrevalenceSocial ClassSocioeconomic FactorsArgentinadiabetes mellitusepidemiologyhealthcare disparities

Identifiers

PMID35897259
PMCPMC9331888

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.