Evidence mapPaperPMID 35897285Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022

Did the New French Regulation of Zolpidem Decrease the Problematic Consumption of Zolpidem? A Field Study among Users.

Edouard-Jules Laforgue, Morgane Rousselet, Antoine Claudon, Aurélie Aquizerate, Pascale Jolliet, Marion Istvan, Caroline Victorri-Vigneau

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Edouard-Jules LaforgueCHU Nantes, Service de Pharmacologie Clinique-Centre d'Evaluation et d'Information sur la Pharmacovigilance-Addictovigilance, Nantes Université, F-44000 Nantes, France.ORCID 0000-0002-7400-1212
Morgane RousseletCHU Nantes, Service de Pharmacologie Clinique-Centre d'Evaluation et d'Information sur la Pharmacovigilance-Addictovigilance, Nantes Université, F-44000 Nantes, France.
Antoine ClaudonCHU Nantes, Service de Pharmacologie Clinique-Centre d'Evaluation et d'Information sur la Pharmacovigilance-Addictovigilance, Nantes Université, F-44000 Nantes, France.
Aurélie AquizerateCHU Nantes, Service de Pharmacologie Clinique-Centre d'Evaluation et d'Information sur la Pharmacovigilance-Addictovigilance, Nantes Université, F-44000 Nantes, France.
Pascale JollietCHU Nantes, Service de Pharmacologie Clinique-Centre d'Evaluation et d'Information sur la Pharmacovigilance-Addictovigilance, Nantes Université, F-44000 Nantes, France.
Marion IstvanCHU Nantes, Service de Pharmacologie Clinique-Centre d'Evaluation et d'Information sur la Pharmacovigilance-Addictovigilance, Nantes Université, F-44000 Nantes, France.
Caroline Victorri-VigneauCHU Nantes, Service de Pharmacologie Clinique-Centre d'Evaluation et d'Information sur la Pharmacovigilance-Addictovigilance, Nantes Université, F-44000 Nantes, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The French national drug regulatory authority stated, in 2017, that a secured prescription pad must be used for zolpidem prescriptions. This study aimed to evaluate the evolution of the problematic consumption of zolpidem at the individual level since the new regulation. Methods: Two nationwide populations of at-risk users of zolpidem were recruited: one in general practitioner (GP) offices and one in specialized care centers dedicated to drug dependence (SCDDs). Participants were asked about their zolpidem consumption before and after the regulation change. The primary outcome was the evolution of problematic zolpidem consumption, as defined by at least one of the following criteria: overconsumption, fraudulent ways of obtaining, effects sought other than hypnotic, and modes of administration other than oral. Results: A total of 243 participants were included: 125 from GP offices and 118 from SCDDs. In the GP population, the prevalence of patients who were identified as problematic consumers decreased from 24.8% to 20.8% (p = 0.593), whereas the prevalence decreased from 73.7% to 51.7% in the SCDD population (p < 0.001). The most prevalent criteria for problematic status were overconsumption and fraudulent ways. Conclusions: The new French regulation of zolpidem had different impacts among two different populations of at-risk zolpidem consumers.

Indexed as

Hypnotics and SedativesSubstance-Related DisordersHumansPrescriptionsPrevalenceZolpidemHypnotics and SedativesZolpidemdrug regulationpatient-related outcomeproblematic consumptionsubstance use disorderzolpidem

Identifiers

PMID35897285
PMCPMC9331950

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.