ArticleHealth promotion practice2024
Use of Community Engagement Studios to Adapt a Hybrid Effectiveness-Implementation Study of Social Incentives and Physical Activity for the STEP Together Study.
Article in Health promotion practice, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cultivating Authentic Partnership: Cooperative Development of a Toolkit to Mitigate Group Harm in Biorepository-Enabled Research.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2026Article
- Designing Electronic Problem-Solving Training for Individuals With Traumatic Brain Injury: Mixed Methods, Community-Based, Participatory Research Case Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Community feedback sessions: An adaptation of the community engagement studio model to enhance scalability.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2026Article
- Co-production of a National Botswana Tobacco Control Resource Center through Community Engagement Studio.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2026Article
- Community Engagement Studio as a Strategic Tool for Tailoring a Survey on Dental Care Access Among Adolescents.Journal of public health dentistry · 2025Article
- Provider and Parent Perspectives on Pediatric Screening for Research on Early Life Adversity.Health education & behavior : the official publication of the Society for Public Health Education · 2025Article
- Design and baseline characteristics of an implementation study to increase activity with social incentives: The STEP together trial.Contemporary clinical trials · 2025Article
- Ask the experts: Community Engagement studios to inform research on cannabis use in cancer symptom management.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2025Article
- Community engagement studios to improve racial diversity and health equity in Parkinson's.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2025Article
- 2021 Community Engagement Studio Virtual Training Summit: Increasing the Diversity of Stakeholders Engaged in Research.Progress in community health partnerships : research, education, and action · 2024Article
- Adapting a dyadic exercise program to be culturally relevant for Hispanic men with prostate cancer using community engagement studio: a brief report.Frontiers in psychology · 2024Article
- Community Engagement Studios to advance multi-site research with older adults.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2024Article
- Exploratory integrated analysis of circulating exosomal miRNA and tissue mRNA related to long-term physical activity for more than 25 years: a bioinformatics study.European journal of applied physiology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Physical activity is known to contribute to good health, but most adults in the United States do not meet recommended physical activity guidelines. Social incentive interventions that leverage insights from behavioral economics have increased physical activity in short-term trials, but there is limited evidence of their effectiveness in community settings or their long-term effectiveness. The STEP Together study is a Hybrid Type 1 effectiveness-implementation study to address these evidence and implementation gaps. This paper describes the process of adapting study procedures prior to the effectiveness trial using Community Engagement (CE) Studios, facilitated meetings during which community members provide feedback on research projects. Six CE Studios were held with community members from the priority population. They were conducted remotely because of the COVID-19 pandemic. Fifteen liaisons representing 13 community organizations and 21 community members from different neighborhoods in Philadelphia participated. Three elements of the study design were modified based on feedback from the CE Studios: lowering the age requirement for an 'older adult', clarifying the definition of family members to include second-degree relatives, and adding a 6-month survey. These adaptations will improve the fit of the effectiveness trial to the local context and improve participant engagement and retention. CE Studios can be used to adapt intervention strategies and other aspects of study design during hybrid implementation-effectiveness trials. This approach was successfully used with remote online participation due to the COVID-19 pandemic and serves as a model for future community-engaged implementation research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.