Evidence mapPaperPMID 35907158Full record

SynthesisSports medicine - open2022

Blended Care Interventions to Promote Physical Activity: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Vivien Hohberg, Reinhard Fuchs, Markus Gerber, David Künzler, Sarah Paganini, Oliver Faude

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Sports medicine - open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Vivien HohbergDepartment of Sports, Exercise and Health, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland. vivien.hohberg@unibas.ch.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0652-8714
Reinhard FuchsDepartment of Sport Psychology, Institute of Sports and Sport Science, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5561-6732
Markus GerberDepartment of Sports, Exercise and Health, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6140-8948
David KünzlerDepartment of Sport Psychology, Institute of Sports and Sport Science, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Sarah PaganiniDepartment of Sport Psychology, Institute of Sports and Sport Science, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4593-6278
Oliver FaudeDepartment of Sports, Exercise and Health, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2832-7780

Funding

Innosuisse - Schweizerische Agentur für Innovationsförderung 27366-1 IP-LS
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBlended care interventions combine therapeutic guidance with digital care. Current research results show the promising role of the blended care approach in clinical care. This new way of delivering health care could have the potential to effectively promote physical activity in different public health settings.

objectiveThe aim of the systematic review is to investigate the varieties of intervention characteristics of blended care interventions to promote physical activity in terms of structure, behavior change goals, behavior change techniques, and effectiveness of blended care interventions compared to a control group.

methodsWe searched for randomized controlled trials published from 2000 to March 2021 in MEDLINE, CINAHL, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, SPORTDiscus, PsycINFO, and Web of Science according to the PRISMA guidelines. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration tool. Study characteristics, intervention characteristics, and outcome data were extracted. Furthermore, the effect size on the outcome of physical activity was examined or calculated.

resultsIn total, the number of reports identified from the database searches was 4828. Of these, 25 studies were included in the review, with a total of 5923 study participants. Results indicated that the characteristics of blended care interventions showed a high heterogeneity. The combinations of therapist-guided interventions and digital interventions allowed the identification of specific subgroups, but they varied in length (range 8-52 weeks, SD 16.6), intensity, and the combination of the components. The most used combination of blended care interventions to promote physical activity was the combination of one-on-one meetings via telephone and Web-based interventions. Motivational models of behavior change were used most frequently as underlying theoretical foundations. Certain behavior change techniques were used consistently across the individual components, e.g., "problem solving" in the therapist-guided component and "feedback on behavior" in the digital component. Considering the effect size of blended care interventions compared with control groups, most studies showed a small effect.

conclusionsIt can be concluded that blended care interventions have potential to promote physical activity. In the future, further high-quality studies should investigate which type of blended care intervention is effective for which target group. Additionally, insights are required on which intervention characteristics are most effective, taking into account new evidence on behavior change. Registration This systematic literature review was registered in PROSPERO ( CRD42020188556 ).

Indexed as

Behavior changeBlended care interventionsDigital interventionPhysical activityTherapist-guided intervention

Identifiers

PMID35907158
PMCPMC9339043

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.