Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35909717›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2022

Moisture Dynamics of Wood-Based Panels and Wood Fibre Insulation Materials.

Liselotte De Ligne, Joris Van Acker, Jan M Baetens, Salah Omar, Bernard De Baets, Lisbeth G Thygesen, Jan Van den Bulcke, Emil E Thybring

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. 19iScience · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Liselotte De LigneLaboratory of Wood Technology (UGent-Woodlab), Department of Environment, Ghent University (UGent), Ghent, Belgium.
Joris Van AckerLaboratory of Wood Technology (UGent-Woodlab), Department of Environment, Ghent University (UGent), Ghent, Belgium.
Jan M BaetensResearch Unit Knowledge-Based Systems (KERMIT), Department of Data Analysis and Mathematical Modelling, Ghent University (UGent), Ghent, Belgium.
Salah OmarLaboratory of Wood Technology (UGent-Woodlab), Department of Environment, Ghent University (UGent), Ghent, Belgium.
Bernard De BaetsResearch Unit Knowledge-Based Systems (KERMIT), Department of Data Analysis and Mathematical Modelling, Ghent University (UGent), Ghent, Belgium.
Lisbeth G ThygesenBioresource Chemistry and Technology, Department of Geosciences and Natural Resource Management, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Jan Van den BulckeLaboratory of Wood Technology (UGent-Woodlab), Department of Environment, Ghent University (UGent), Ghent, Belgium.
Emil E ThybringBioresource Chemistry and Technology, Department of Geosciences and Natural Resource Management, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Ghent University · BEUniversity of Copenhagen · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Moisture performance is an important factor determining the resistance of wood-based building materials against fungal decay. Understanding how material porosity and chemistry affect moisture performance is necessary for their efficient use, as well as for product optimisation. In this study, three complementary techniques (X-ray computed tomography, infrared and low-field NMR spectroscopy) are applied to elucidate the influence of additives, manufacturing process and material structure on the liquid water absorption and desorption behaviour of a selection of wood-based panels, thermally modified wood and wood fibre insulation materials. Hydrophobic properties achieved by thermal treatment or hydrophobic additives such as paraffin and bitumen, had a major influence on water absorption and desorption rates. When hydrophobic additives did not play a role, pore distributions and manufacturing process had a decisive influence on the amount and rate of absorption and desorption. In that case, a higher porosity resulted in a higher water absorption rate. Our results show that there is a clear potential for tailoring materials towards specific moisture performance by better understanding the influence of different material characteristics. This is useful both for achieving desired moisture buffering as well as to increase service life of wood-based materials. From a sustainability perspective, fit-for-purpose moisture performance is often easier to achieve and preferred than wood protection by biocide preservative treatments.

Indexed as

ATR-FTIRLFNMRmoisture dynamicsservice lifewood-based panelswood fibre insulationX-ray CT

Identifiers

PMID35909717
PMCPMC9330446
OpenAlexW4285389977

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.