ArticleFrontiers in oncology2022
The Safety and Efficacy of Nanosecond Pulsed Electric Field in Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Prospective Phase 1 Clinical Study Protocol.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04309747 (A Prospective, Multicenter Clinical Trial of Safety and Effectiveness of Nanosecond Knife Ablation for Liver Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Prospective, Multicenter Clinical Trial of Safety and Effectiveness of Nanosecond Knife Ablation for Liver Cancer
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Beyond Tumor Treating Fields: Multimodal Antitumor Action and the Clinical Potential of Pulsed Electromagnetic Fields.Current medical science · 2026Review
- Oncolytic peptide LTX-315 targets PD-L1 to improve antitumor immune response of nanosecond pulse electric field in liver cancer.Journal for immunotherapy of cancer · 2026Article
- Article
- Non-contact electroacoustic tomography with optical interferometer for electroporation therapy monitoring.Applied physics letters · 2025Article
- Nano-Pulse Stimulation Therapy in Oncology.Bioelectricity · 2024Review
- Threatment Strategies for Recurrent Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients: Ablation and its Combination Patterns.Journal of Cancer · 2024Review
- Pulsed Field Ablation for the Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation: A Review and a Look into its Future.The heart surgery forum · 2024Article
- Non-Thermal Liver Ablation: Existing and New Technology.Seminars in interventional radiology · 2023Review
- Nanosecond pulsed electric field ablation-induced modulation of sphingolipid metabolism is associated with Ly6c2Molecular oncology · 2023Article
- Immunogenic Cell Death in Electroporation-Based Therapies Depends on Pulse Waveform Characteristics.Vaccines · 2023Article
- Article
- Nanosecond pulsed electric field ablates rabbit VX2 liver tumors in a non-thermal manner.PloS one · 2023Article
- Nanosecond pulse effectively ablated hepatocellular carcinoma with alterations in the gut microbiome and serum metabolites.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a highly aggressive malignancy. Irreversible electroporation (IRE) is an ablative modality that uses high-voltage electrical pulses to permeabilize the cell membrane leading to cell necrosis. Unlike traditional thermal ablation, IRE is hardly affected by the "heat-sink" effect and can prevent damage of the adjacent vital structures. Nanosecond pulsed electric field (nsPEF) is a new IRE technique using ultra-short pulses (nanosecond duration), can not only penetrate the cell membranes, but also act on the organelles. Sufficient preclinical researches have shown that nsPEF can eliminate HCC without damaging vital organs, and elicit potent anti-tumor immune response. Objective: This is the first clinical study to evaluate feasibility, efficacy, and safety of nsPEF for the treatment of HCC, where thermal ablation is unsuitable due to proximity to critical structures. Methods and analysis: We will conduct an open-labeled, single-arm, prospective, multicenter, and objective performance criteria trial. One hundred and ninety-two patients with HCC, in which the tumor is located immediately (<0.5 cm) adjacent to the portal vein, hepatic veins, bile duct, gastrointestinal tract, or diaphragm, will be enrolled among 4 academic medical centers. The primary outcomes are the rate of complete ablation at 1 month and adverse events. Secondary outcomes include technical success, technique efficacy, nsPEF procedural characteristics, local tumor progression, and local progression-free survival. Ethics and dissemination: The trial will be conducted according to the ethical principles of the Declaration of Helsinki and has been approved by the ethics committee of all participating centers. The results of this study will be published in peer-reviewed scientific journals and presented at relevant academic conferences. Conclusions: This study is the Phase 1 clinical trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of nsPEF in patients with HCC at high-risk locations where thermal ablation is contra-indicated. The results may expand the options and offer an alternative therapy for HCC. Clinical Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier NCT04309747.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.