Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35913626›Full record

ReviewChirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany)2022

[Modern molecular and imaging diagnostics in pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms].

Costanza Chiapponi, Christiane J Bruns

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Chirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 92% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Costanza ChiapponiKlinik für Allgemein‑, Viszeral‑, Tumor- und Transplantationschirurgie, Uniklinik Köln, Kerpenerstr. 62, 50937, Köln, Deutschland. Costanza.Chiapponi@uk-koeln.de.
Christiane J BrunsKlinik für Allgemein‑, Viszeral‑, Tumor- und Transplantationschirurgie, Uniklinik Köln, Kerpenerstr. 62, 50937, Köln, Deutschland.
LVR-Klinik Köln · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectiveNew molecular diagnostic and radiologic imaging techniques can be used to assess the extent, risk of recurrence, prognosis and response to treatment of pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (pNENs). They therefore represent a decisive help in setting the indications for surgical treatment, especially in advanced stages.

methodsThis article presents a narrative assessment of the options and evidence for modern molecular and radiologic imaging diagnostics of pNENs based on the current literature.

resultsWhile circulating DNA, circulating tumor cells and microRNAs have not yet become established in everyday clinical practice, the current literature suggests a promising role for the so-called NETest. Recent studies demonstrated its possible importance for the surgical management of pNENs. Besides [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-SSA-PET and [18]FDG-PET, which remain the gold standards for imaging NENs, radiomics represent an exciting alternative to biopsies and will possibly play an increasingly important role in the future. DISCUSSION: There are new promising alternatives to chromogranin A, which has been clinically widespread since the 1970s despite several drawbacks, to map the extent, risk of recurrence, prognosis and response to treatment of pancreatic pNENs. In terms of personalized medicine, modern molecular and radiological diagnostics should play an increasing role for indicating and planning surgical treatment and for follow-up in the future.

Indexed as

Neuroendocrine TumorsPancreatic NeoplasmsChromogranin AHumansPositron-Emission TomographyPrognosisChromogranin AAlterationsGenomicsMultiple endocrine neoplasmsNETestRadiomics

Identifiers

PMID35913626
OpenAlexW4281478148

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.