Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35915408›Full record

ArticleBMC nephrology2022

External validation of six clinical models for prediction of chronic kidney disease in a German population.

Susanne Stolpe, Bernd Kowall, Denise Zwanziger, Mirjam Frank, Karl-Heinz Jöckel, Raimund Erbel, Andreas Stang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC nephrology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Quality of Antibiotic Prescribing for Outpatient Cystitis in Adult Females.Journal of the Association of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Disease Canada = Journal officiel de l'Association pour la microbiologie medicale et l'infectiologie Canada · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Susanne StolpeInstitute for Medical Informatics, Biometry and Epidemiology, University Hospital Essen, Hufelandstr. 55, 45147, Essen, Germany. Susanne.stolpe@uk-essen.de.
Bernd KowallInstitute for Medical Informatics, Biometry and Epidemiology, University Hospital Essen, Hufelandstr. 55, 45147, Essen, Germany.
Denise ZwanzigerInstitute for Medical Informatics, Biometry and Epidemiology, University Hospital Essen, Hufelandstr. 55, 45147, Essen, Germany.
Mirjam FrankInstitute for Medical Informatics, Biometry and Epidemiology, University Hospital Essen, Hufelandstr. 55, 45147, Essen, Germany.
Karl-Heinz JöckelInstitute for Medical Informatics, Biometry and Epidemiology, University Hospital Essen, Hufelandstr. 55, 45147, Essen, Germany.
Raimund ErbelInstitute for Medical Informatics, Biometry and Epidemiology, University Hospital Essen, Hufelandstr. 55, 45147, Essen, Germany.
Andreas StangInstitute for Medical Informatics, Biometry and Epidemiology, University Hospital Essen, Hufelandstr. 55, 45147, Essen, Germany.
Institut für Medizinische Informatik, Biometrie und Epidemiologie · DEBoston University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundChronic kidney disease (CKD) is responsible for large personal health and societal burdens. Screening populations at higher risk for CKD is effective to initiate earlier treatment and decelerate disease progress. We externally validated clinical prediction models for unknown CKD that might be used in population screening.

methodsWe validated six risk models for prediction of CKD using only non-invasive parameters. Validation data came from 4,185 participants of the German Heinz-Nixdorf-Recall study (HNR), drawn in 2000 from a general population aged 45-75 years. We estimated discrimination and calibration using the full model information, and calculated the diagnostic properties applying the published scoring algorithms of the models using various thresholds for the sum of scores.

resultsThe risk models used four to nine parameters. Age and hypertension were included in all models. Five out of six c-values ranged from 0.71 to 0.73, indicating fair discrimination. Positive predictive values ranged from 15 to 19%, negative predictive values were > 93% using score thresholds that resulted in values for sensitivity and specificity above 60%.

conclusionsMost of the selected CKD prediction models show fair discrimination in a German general population. The estimated diagnostic properties indicate that the models are suitable for identifying persons at higher risk for unknown CKD without invasive procedures.

Indexed as

HypertensionRenal Insufficiency, ChronicHumansMass ScreeningPredictive Value of TestsRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsSensitivity and SpecificityChronic Kidney DiseaseExternal Validation SensitivityPrediction Model ScreeningSpecificity ROC Curve

Identifiers

PMID35915408
PMCPMC9341089
OpenAlexW4289223915

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.