ArticleAesthetic plastic surgery2023
Oncologic Safety and Efficacy of Cell-Assisted Lipotransfer for Breast Reconstruction in a Murine Model of Residual Breast Cancer.
Article in Aesthetic plastic surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Advancing fat graft survival: from adipose-derived stem cell mechanisms to next-generation regenerative strategies.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026Review
- Adipose-derived stem cells enhance the tumorigenic potential of pre-malignant breast epithelial cells through paracrine activation of PI3K-AKT pathway.Breast cancer (Tokyo, Japan) · 2025Article
- Breast fat grafting and cancer: a systematic review of the science behind enhancements and concerns.Translational breast cancer research : a journal focusing on translational research in breast cancer · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCell-assisted lipotransfer (CAL) is a novel technique for fat grafting that combines the grafting of autologous fat and adipose-derived stromal cells (ASCs) to enhance fat graft retention; however, its oncologic safety is controversial.
methodsHerein, we investigated the oncologic safety of CAL for breast reconstruction using a murine model of residual breast cancer. Various concentrations of 4T1 cells (murine breast cancer cells) were injected into female mastectomized BALB/c mice to determine the appropriate concentration for injection. One week after injection, mice were divided into control (100 μL fat), low CAL (2.5 × 10
resultsThe weight of the fat tumor mass was significantly higher in the high CAL group than in the other groups (p < 0.05). However, the estimated tumor weight was not significantly different between the groups. Additionally, the fat graft survival rate was significantly higher in the high CAL group than in the control and low CAL groups (p < 0.05). No significant difference was noted in the percentage of Ki-67-positive cells, suggesting that tumor proliferation was not significantly different between the groups.
conclusionIn summary, CAL significantly improved fat graft survival without affecting tumor size and proliferation in a murine model of residual breast cancer. These results highlight the oncologic safety of CAL for breast reconstruction. NO LEVEL ASSIGNED: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each submission to which Evidence-Based Medicine rankings are applicable. This excludes Review Articles, Book Reviews, and manuscripts that concern Basic Science, Animal Studies, Cadaver Studies, and Experimental Studies. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .
Indexed as
Identifiers
35918436What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.