ArticleIndian journal of ophthalmology2022
Analysis on the completeness of case records of patients with penetrating ocular trauma following a multimodal intervention.
Article in Indian journal of ophthalmology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Commentary: Internal audit for assessment and improvement of quality of medical records.Indian journal of ophthalmology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To describe the process development of a multimodal intervention and the pre- and postintervention results on the completeness of case records of patients with penetrating ocular trauma in a high-volume tertiary eye care hospital in south India. Methods: A multimodal intervention including an objective-validated case sheet template, an education program, a physical template case record reminder, a continuous near-real time audit process, and a feedback system was developed. Analysis on the completeness of the case records of patients with ocular trauma from October 2020 to December 2020 (preintervention) and from January 2021 to March 2021 (postintervention) was performed. These case records and the personnel involved in the documentation, were given scores based on the scores assigned to the subsections of the validated template case sheet. The mean total score of the case records and of the personnel involved were analyzed. Results: One hundred and eleven case records of patients with ocular trauma who underwent primary wound repair were included in the study. Of these 111 case records, 46 belonged to preintervention group and 65 belonged to postintervention group. The mean total score for preintervention group during the study period was 57.93 ± 24 out of 100 and for postintervention group was 99.07 ± 4.49 out of 100. The temporal trend of postintervention group showed a consistent improvement every month (97.14, 100,100) during the 3-month study period. Postintervention improvement was noted in all the sections of case records completed by both fellows and consultants. Conclusion: A sustained improvement in ocular trauma case record documentation among all levels of medical professionals was noted following the five-component multimodal intervention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.