Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35921237›Full record

SynthesisNeuropathology and applied neurobiology2022

The contribution of brain banks to knowledge discovery in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: A systematic review.

Srestha Mazumder, Matthew C Kiernan, Glenda M Halliday, Hannah C Timmins, Colin J Mahoney

Open access · hybridAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Neuropathology and applied neurobiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Brain donation rules in Italy and worldwide: overview of a cutting-edge topic for human brain research.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2025
    Review
  4. An analysis of RNA quality metrics in human brain tissue.Journal of neuropathology and experimental neurology · 2025
    Article
  5. Gaps in biomedical research in frontotemporal dementia: A call for diversity and disparities focused research.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2024
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Regional health priorities for dementia: a roadmap for the Western Pacific.The Lancet regional health. Western Pacific · 2024
    Review
  8. Brain banking in the United States and Europe: Importance, challenges, and future trends.Journal of neuropathology and experimental neurology · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Survival in sporadic ALS is associated with lower p62 burden in the spinal cord.Journal of neuropathology and experimental neurology · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Srestha MazumderForeFront Clinic, Brain and Mind Centre, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-5322-5543
Matthew C KiernanForeFront Clinic, Brain and Mind Centre, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Glenda M HallidayFrontier, Brain and Mind Centre, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-0422-8398
Hannah C TimminsForeFront Clinic, Brain and Mind Centre, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Colin J MahoneyForeFront Clinic, Brain and Mind Centre, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
The University of Sydney · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Over the past decade, considerable efforts have been made to accelerate pathophysiological understanding of fatal neurodegenerative diseases such as amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) with brain banks at the forefront. In addition to exploratory disease mechanisms, brain banks have aided our understanding with regard to clinical diagnosis, genetics and cell biology. Across neurodegenerative disorders, the impact of brain tissue in ALS research has yet to be quantified. This review aims to outline (i) how postmortem tissues from brain banks have influenced our understanding of ALS over the last 15 years, (ii) correlate the location of dedicated brain banks with the geographical prevalence of ALS, (iii) identify the frequency of features reported from postmortem studies and (iv) propose common reporting standards for materials obtained from dedicated brain banks. A systematic review was conducted using PubMed and Web of Science databases using key words. From a total of 1439 articles, 73 articles were included in the final review, following PRISMA guidelines. Following a thematic analysis, articles were categorised into five themes; clinico-pathological (13), genetic (20), transactive response DNA binding protein 43 (TDP-43) pathology (12), non-TDP-43 neuronal pathology (nine) and extraneuronal pathology (19). Research primarily focused on the genetics of ALS, followed by protein pathology. About 63% of the brain banks were in the United States of America and United Kingdom. The location of brain banks overall aligned with the incidence of ALS worldwide with 88% of brain banks situated in Europe and North America. An overwhelming lack of consistency in reporting and replicability was observed, strengthening the need for a standardised reporting system. Overall, postmortem material from brain banks generated substantial new knowledge in areas of genetics and proteomics and supports their ongoing role as an important research tool.

Indexed as

Amyotrophic Lateral SclerosisBrainHumansKnowledge DiscoveryNeuronsUnited Kingdomamyotrophic lateral sclerosisautopsybrain bankC9orf72motor neuron diseasepathologyTDP-43

Identifiers

PMID35921237
PMCPMC9804699
OpenAlexW4289638029

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.