Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35928134›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in neurology2022

Non-invasive brain stimulation associated mirror therapy for upper-limb rehabilitation after stroke: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.

Qingqing Zhao, Hong Li, Yu Liu, Haonan Mei, Liying Guo, Xianying Liu, Xiaolin Tao, Jiang Ma

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in neurology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Combined transcranial direct current stimulation and mirror therapy for upper limb rehabilitation in patients with stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Qingqing ZhaoDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Shijiazhuang People's Hospital, Shijiazhuang, China.
Hong LiDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Shijiazhuang People's Hospital, Shijiazhuang, China.
Yu LiuDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Shijiazhuang People's Hospital, Shijiazhuang, China.
Haonan MeiCollege of Nursing and Rehabilitation, North China University of Science and Technology, Tangshan, China.
Liying GuoDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Shijiazhuang People's Hospital, Shijiazhuang, China.
Xianying LiuDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Shijiazhuang People's Hospital, Shijiazhuang, China.
Xiaolin TaoDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Shijiazhuang People's Hospital, Shijiazhuang, China.
Jiang MaDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Shijiazhuang People's Hospital, Shijiazhuang, China.
First Hospital of Shijiazhuang · CNNorth China University of Science and Technology · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) techniques and mirror therapy (MT) are promising rehabilitation measures for stroke. While the combination of MT and NIBS has been employed for post-stroke upper limb motor functional rehabilitation, its effectiveness has not been examined. Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of combined MT and NIBS in the recovery of upper limb motor function in stroke patients. Methods: The search was carried out in PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Science Direct, CNKI, WANFANG and VIP until December 2021. Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) comparing MT or NIBS alone with the combination of NIBS and MT in improving upper extremity motor recovery after stroke were selected. A meta-analysis was performed to calculate the mean differences (MD) or the standard mean differences (SMD) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) with random-effect models. Subgroup analyses were also conducted according to the types of control group, the types of NIBS, stimulation timing and phase poststroke. Results: A total of 12 articles, including 17 studies with 628 patients, were reviewed in the meta-analysis. In comparison with MT or NIBS alone, the combined group significantly improved body structure and function (MD = 5.97; 95% CI: 5.01-6.93; Conclusion: In this meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials, in comparison to the control groups, MT combined with NIBS promoted the recovery of upper extremity motor function after stroke, which was reflected in the analysis of body structure and function, activity levels, and cortical excitability. Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier CRD42022304455.

Indexed as

meta-analysismirror therapy (MT)non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS)repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS)stroketranscranial direct current stimulation (tDCS)upper motor function

Identifiers

PMID35928134
PMCPMC9345505
OpenAlexW4285796975

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.