Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35928877›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in oncology2022

Novel Agents For Relapsed and Refractory Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma: A Review.

Yujie Zhang, Zhichao Xing, Li Mi, Zhihui Li, Jingqiang Zhu, Tao Wei, Wenshuang Wu

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yujie ZhangDepartment of Thyroid Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Zhichao XingDepartment of Thyroid Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Li MiDepartment of Thyroid Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Zhihui LiDepartment of Thyroid Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Jingqiang ZhuDepartment of Thyroid Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Tao WeiDepartment of Thyroid Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Wenshuang WuDepartment of Thyroid Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Sichuan University · CNWest China Hospital of Sichuan University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL) is the most common type of HL that occurs mainly in people aged between 15-30 and over 55 years. Although its general prognosis is favorable, 10%-30% of patients with cHL will ultimately develop relapsed or refractory disease (r/r cHL). Improving the cure rate of r/r cHL has proven to be challenging. Some novel agents, such as brentuximab vedotin and immune checkpoint inhibitors, which have been used in conventional regimens for patients with r/r cHL in the past decade, have been shown to have good curative effects. This paper reviews the conventional regimens for patients with r/r cHL and focuses on the newest clinical trials and treatment measures to prolong prognosis and reduce adverse events. The evaluation of prognosis plays a vital role in analyzing the risk of relapse or disease progression; thus, finding new predictive strategies may help treat patients with r/r cHL more efficaciously.

Indexed as

brentuximab vedotinnivolumabnovel agentspembrolizumabrelapsed and refractory classical hodgkin lymphoma

Identifiers

PMID35928877
PMCPMC9344040
OpenAlexW4286239332

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.